returned with the postal endorsement as 'Intimation given
Unclaimed Returned to the Sender' and as such, it is incorrect.
Further, the Petitioner ... address and the same returned with
a Postal Endorsement as 'Intimation Given. Unclaimed returned to
the Sender'. In the returned cover, two dates
finally held that
mere return of notice as intimated unclaimed by itself
would not amount to constructive service of notice when it
is not averred
notice was returned by the postal
authority with the remark "Intimation Unclaimed", however the
respondents did not confirm and/or concur
Absent' on
23.05.2017, 24.05.2017 itself not amounts that, the accused
unclaimed. Unless intimation was delivered to the accused,
question of unclaimed ... also not satisfactorily explained.
Without deliver the intimation, unclaimed the R.P.A.D does not
arise, therefore, the endorsement made by the postal authority
were returned back to the complainant with endorsement
'Unclaimed' 'Intimation'.
Munesh Kumari v. Rajesh Khurana and Ors CC No. 55119
posting. The Postal cover sent
under registered post returned with endorsement “Intimation given.
unclaimed”, whereas the notice sent under certificate of posting did not
return
same
was returned on 18.03.2015, with an endorsement 'intimation
served' 'unclaimed' to sender. The petitioner has not paid the said
said
notice was returned with a shara "intimation delivered" as per
Ex.P.5 postal cover. So, it is settled principal ... issued to the proper address and it may returned
with unclaimed nor intimation delivered etc., then the service of
notice is deemed one. So, here
issued to the
accused was returned with the shara as ''Unclaimed". It is
pertinent to note here that, the accused ... returns with the sharas as absent, door locked, shop
closed, intimation delivered, unclaimed, etc., the
presumption arises that the complainant had dispatched the
said notice
appellant. The
appellant stated that the 1st respondent intimated him that the amount which
was unclaimed and unpaid for a period of 7 years from ... Pune vide its letter dated
7.11.2013 (Page 70) intimated that the unclaimed amount has been deposited
with the IEPF vide challan dated
