bank is merged with another
bank and cheque got invalid, then the invalid cheque does not come under
bounce cheque. He voluntarily stated that ... that the bank does
not accept invalid cheque after 01.04.2021 and the cheque in question was
invalid cheque and not come under bounced cheque. Also
first three cheques in question were returned
dishonoured with remarks "Cheque Invalid/Corporation Bank merged
with Union Bank of India" vide cheque return ... stated to be 'Corporation Bank
merged with Union Bank, cheque invalid'.
36. Corporation Bank merged with the Union Bank of India
Section 138 N.I. Act, it is clear that if any invalid cheque
is presented before the Bank and the same was dishonoured, then there ... Andhra Pradesh , 2024 SCC OnLine AP 5115 has held
that an invalid cheque will not attract the liability
cheque
cannot be expected to know whether the drawee has appended his correct
signatures on the cheque or not; the receiver of the cheque cannot ... drawee after issuing the cheque will issue the
order to stop the payment of the cheque; the receiver of the cheque cannot
be expected
Kumar, (2019) 4 SCC 197, ¶ 34). This, in
itself, would not invalidate the cheque (Ibid). The onus would still be on the accused
to prove ... Kumar,
(2019) 4 SCC 197, ¶ 34). This, in itself, would not invalidate the cheque. The onus
would still be on the accused to prove that
permits the holder of an uncrossed
cheque to cross it and that would not render the cheque invalid for the purposes of
presentation for payment ... permits the holder of an
uncrossed cheque to cross it and that would not render the cheque invalid for the
purposes of presentation for payment
other person as
endorsee and to complete the endorsement into a blank cheque, it makes
it clear that by doing that the holder does ... permits the holder of an uncrossed
cheque to cross it and that would not render the cheque invalid for the
purposes of presentation for payment
mandatory presumptions of law as discussed above if an
accepted signed cheque has been produced by the complainant,
then there cannot be any inherent lacuna ... been contended that there
has been material alteration in the cheque, rendering the cheque
invalid and the same can not be used for launching action
cheque has
been admitted or stands proved, a
presumption arises in favour of the holder of
the cheque that he had received the cheque ... Therefore, filling up of date in the cheque
by respondent/complainant will not make the
cheque invalid as he had an implied authority from
cheque
by any person, other than the drawer does not invalidate the
cheque and the liability under Section 138 NI Act/presumption
under Section ... cheque may
have been filled in by any person other than the
drawer, if the cheque is duly signed by the drawer. If
the cheque
