cheque was not filled by the
petitioner.
Filling of the amount or other particulars in the cheque by the
payee would not invalidate the cheque ... amount
and other particulars. This in itself would not invalidate the
cheque. The onus would still be on the accused to prove that
the cheque
present case, the cheque was dishonoured on account of
'insufficient funds' and the signatures on the cheque were not disputed. The
only issue ... cheque. Even
otherwise, simply because the cheque is filled up in a different hand, may
not be enough to make the cheque invalid, particularly when
Magma Leasing Ltd. , (1999) 4
SCC 253. Further, invalidation of the cheque on account of merger with another
bank would be a disputed question ... petitioner with him or the petitioner himself gave the alleged invalid cheque,
which was dishonoured on presentation by respondent No.2. Therefore, at this
nascent
that such difference in hand-writing ipso-facto would
not invalidate the cheque or render its authenticity doubtful. It was held as
under ... amount and
other particulars. This in itself would not invalidate the cheque.
The onus would still be on the accused to prove that the cheque
that such difference in hand-writing ipso-facto would
not invalidate the cheque or render its authenticity doubtful. It was held as
under ... amount and
other particulars. This in itself would not invalidate the cheque.
The onus would still be on the accused to prove that the cheque
cheque bearing no. 641046 dated 01.10.2018
however when the cheque was presented for encashment, the same was returned
with the remark "e-SDPO invalid
prayer was made that validity of the cheque be extended but
however, the Hon'ble Supreme Court observed that the said period ... said
period, then, there could be a possibility of his cheque becoming invalid.
Thus, no fault could be found with the complainant in the present
disclosure of certain concealed income. The petitioner-company also enclosed a cheque for Rs. 50,000 with the disclosure statement. It is not disputed that ... 22nd March, 1965. The declaration sent along with your letter is invalid. The cheque for Rs. 50,000 is returned herewith."
The real controversy
months from the date the cheque bears." The post-dating of the cheque does not make it invalid, but when such a cheque ... suffer loss, if the drawer of the cheque countermands the cheque before the date of the cheque, by a stop payment order or he dies
cheque may have been
filled in by any person other than the drawer, if the cheque
is duly signed by the drawer. If the cheque ... amount and other particulars. This in itself would not
invalidate the cheque. The onus would still be on the
accused to prove that the cheque
