applicant contends that the Bank returned the cheque in question because the cheque was invalid as the cheque in question was issued from the account ... well as presentation of the cheque, it was invalid. Therefore, bouncing, of such the invalid cheque will not attract the liability
were dishonoured for the reason "Kindly provide new
cheque and cheque leave is invalid/cheque excluded".
3
C.C.No.55283/2023 ... cheques for
the reason "Kindly provide new cheque
and cheque leave is invalid/cheque
excluded" due to merger of banks would
attract
bank is merged with another
bank and cheque got invalid, then the invalid cheque does not come under
bounce cheque. He voluntarily stated that ... that the bank does
not accept invalid cheque after 01.04.2021 and the cheque in question was
invalid cheque and not come under bounced cheque. Also
cheques vide notification (Annexure P-4), therefore, an
invalid cheque was presented by the complainant. No legal
rt
liability exists and learned Trial Court erred ... arrangements and the cheque was not returned by
the banker stating that the cheque was not a CTS cheque,
further the cheque was not returned
cheque books by surrendering old cheque books,
failing which, the old cheque leaves would be considered as
invalid cheque leaves. Further, the documents ... means, when the cheque was presented
to the bank, at that time, the cheque at Ex.P.1 has not
became invalid. If the accused
first three cheques in question were returned
dishonoured with remarks "Cheque Invalid/Corporation Bank merged
with Union Bank of India" vide cheque return ... stated to be 'Corporation Bank
merged with Union Bank, cheque invalid'.
36. Corporation Bank merged with the Union Bank of India
Court is not sufficient to
invalidate the proceedings.
14
( 2024:HHC:10405 )
19. It was submitted that the cheque was issued in the
name
other person as endorsee and to
complete the endorsement into a blank cheque,
it makes it clear that by doing that the holder
does ... permits the holder of an uncrossed cheque to
cross it and that would not render the cheque
invalid for the purposes of presentation for
Signature
Amarendra Dhari Singh vs Aditi Shivinder Singh on 5 November, 2024
Author: Navin Chawla
Bench
other person as endorsee and to
complete the endorsement into a blank cheque,
it makes it clear that by doing that the holder
does ... permits the holder of an uncrossed cheque to
cross it and that would not render the cheque
invalid for the purposes of presentation for
Signature
