petitioner had secured 512 votes and the 1st respondent had secured 509 votes. 51 votes were declared as invalid.
5. The 1st respondent was dissatisfied ... election for the post of Sarpanch.
(4) If the number of invalid votes is between 5 to 10% of the total number of polled votes
Parishad Territorial Constituency Member as he secured 9614 votes and the second respondent secured 9606 votes. The petitioner was duly declared elected as Zilla Parishad ... petitioner's election was questioned on the ground that invalid votes polled were counted as valid votes in his favour and valid votes polled
Returning Officer, that is Respondent No.20, had deliberately declared as invalid, votes validly cast in favour of the first respondent inspite of protests ... made on the basis of doubt. Similarly, the allegation that the invalid votes polled in favour of the petitioner were declared valid is vague because
Polling Station No.88 ought to have been rejected as invalid votes?
(10) Whether the election petitioner is gallty of booth capturing and comipt practice ... Polling Station No.88 ought to have been rejected as invalid votes?
24. In support of his pleadings, the election-petitioner examined himself
notice or the form of notice would render the vote of no-confidence invalid. The object of procedural law is to serve the person
presenting to the Revenue Divisional Officer and consequently, the vote of no-confidence is invalid.
4. Jurisprudentially, it is well established that in an election ... notice or the form of notice would render the vote of no-confidence invalid. The object of procedural law is to serve the person
ultra vires the provisions of the Gram Panchayat Act and as such invalid on the ground of being ultra vires. The second question that would ... motion on which '7' members out of 11 members had voted must be held to have been carried?
It is not in dispute
M.A.R.V.S. Sai Babu vs Commissioner And Registrar Of Co.Op. ... on
Dr. Y.S. Rajasekhara Reddy And Others vs His Excellency, The Government Of A.P
A.P. Dalit Mahasabha vs Govt. Of A.P. And Ors. on 4 March, 1999
