Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

that respondent No.2 has acted upon by reversing the share pledge invocation transactions. However, the fact remains that since 2005 Respondent

were pledged in favour of Appellant in 2014 itself and that, subsequently, vide the impugned 2016 Pledge Agreement, the CD pledged the remaining 15% shares ... make any reference to the Alleged 2014 Pledge Agreement either in the pledge invocation letter or in its Claim Dorm and only relied upon

that respondent No.2 has acted upon by reversing the share pledge invocation transactions. However, the fact remains that since 2005 Respondent

claim of the Appellant on the ground that on invocation of the Pledged Shares, the Appellant had become beneficiary owner of the Pledged Shares ... Pledged Shares on 17.06.2019 and perfected its title to the Pledged Shares by registering itself as beneficial owner in respect of the Pledged Shares

over by the Resolution Plan and further that the transaction of invocation of pledge and subsequent sale by the 2nd Respondent is a fraudulent ... points out that the Resolution Professional had acknowledged the invocation of the Pledge by the 2nd Respondent and that appropriation of the Pledged Shares

over by the Resolution Plan and further that the transaction of invocation of pledge and subsequent sale by the 2nd Respondent is a fraudulent ... points out that the Resolution Professional had acknowledged the invocation of the Pledge by the 2nd Respondent and that appropriation of the Pledged Shares

pledge and claims control of SGAH and consequently SACL as well. The ABT-UK who pledged its shares with Aapico has challenged the invocation ... Share Charge Agreement, therefore, the Petitioner therein cannot question the invocation of pledge by Aapico. Due to defaults of the loan

pledge and claims control of SGAH and consequently SACL as well. The ABT-UK who pledged its shares with Aapico has challenged the invocation ... Share Charge Agreement, therefore, the Petitioner therein cannot question the invocation of pledge by Aapico. Due to defaults of the loan

Tribunal has already been initiated on the basis of invocation of the Guarantee and Pledge Shares, hence, the liability is imminent and claim ... payment has been made by the Appellant(s) (Promoter Guarantors) towards invocation of Securities cannot be a ground for rejection of the claim

further submitted that as on the date of invocation, the price of pledged shares, according to the date available and procured from the official website ... Price on Share on Value of Share on Pledged Pledged the date of the date of Invocation (in Rs.) Invocation SABTNL