appeal, preferred by them, before
the learned Intellectual Property Appellate Board (IPAB), against the
revocation of the suit patent. Paras ... orders are passed in favour of the,
Plaintiffs by the IPAB, in the appeal preferred by them.
Accordingly, I.A under Order XXXIX Rule
High Court under the 1958
Act or by the Registrar or the IPAB under the 1999 Act
and not by the civil court. The civil ... decisions rendered
by the prescribed statutory authority [Registrar/High Court
(now IPAB)] will bind the civil court. At the same time,
the Act (both
which replaced the Tribunals - in this case, the
Intellectual Property Appellate Board (IPAB) - would be the
High Court having jurisdiction over the bench ... IPAB
which was abolished.
(iii) Next, Mr. Vaidyanathan cited Rule 48 of the Trade Marks
8
4. Appropriate office of the Trade Marks Registry
which replaced the Tribunals - in this case, the
Intellectual Property Appellate Board (IPAB) - would be the
High Court having jurisdiction over the bench ... IPAB
which was abolished.
(iii) Next, Mr. Vaidyanathan cited Rule 48 of the Trade Marks
8
4. Appropriate office of the Trade Marks Registry
declined the prayer for stay of operation of the
judgment of the IPAB. This order was carried in appeal to the Division
Bench of this ... when it was assigned to Thukral by Jain. This
11 "IPAB" hereinafter
12 P.M. Diesels Pvt Ltd v. Thukral Mechanical Works
September 2020 passed by the Intellectual Property
Appellate Board ("the IPAB"). The suits allege infringement, by the
respective defendants, of Indian Patent ... preferred
an appeal against the decision of the Joint Controller, to IPAB. In the
circumstances, this Court adjourned the matter, instead of dismissing
September 2020 passed by the Intellectual Property
Appellate Board ("the IPAB"). The suits allege infringement, by the
respective defendants, of Indian Patent ... preferred
an appeal against the decision of the Joint Controller, to IPAB. In the
circumstances, this Court adjourned the matter, instead of dismissing
September 2020 passed by the Intellectual Property
Appellate Board ("the IPAB"). The suits allege infringement, by the
respective defendants, of Indian Patent ... preferred
an appeal against the decision of the Joint Controller, to IPAB. In the
circumstances, this Court adjourned the matter, instead of dismissing
September 2020 passed by the Intellectual Property
Appellate Board ("the IPAB"). The suits allege infringement, by the
respective defendants, of Indian Patent ... preferred
an appeal against the decision of the Joint Controller, to IPAB. In the
circumstances, this Court adjourned the matter, instead of dismissing
September 2020 passed by the Intellectual Property
Appellate Board ("the IPAB"). The suits allege infringement, by the
respective defendants, of Indian Patent ... preferred
an appeal against the decision of the Joint Controller, to IPAB. In the
circumstances, this Court adjourned the matter, instead of dismissing
