Section 222 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860
222. Intentional omission to apprehend on the part of public servant bound to apprehend person under sentence
accused-
appellant Subhash Chand under Section 218 and 222 of
The Indian Penal Code , 1860 (for short, IPC ). He has been
sentenced ... giving necessary copies to the
accused persons as required under section 207 Cr.P.C.,
committed the case to the court of Sessions for trial
02404R0168532014
FIR No : 222/14
P. S : Alipur
u/s 307 IPC
25/27/54/59 Arms Act
The State versus Vinod @ Sheelu ... deposition of PW5.
16. Thereafter, statement of accused u/s 313
Cr.PC were recorded. Accused denied all the
incriminating evidence
were convicted under s. 120B and S. 224 / 109
of the Indian Penal Code and s. 5(2) Of the Prevention of
Corruption ... Delhi under s. 120B and s. 224 / 109 of the Indian Penal
Code and s. 5(2) of the Prevention of Corruption
prosecution that statement of Mela Ram home
guard official under Section 164 Cr.P.C. was also recorded
before Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate ... read with
Section 120-B , 201 , 202 , 218 and 222 of Indian Penal Code.
Learned trial Court charged other co-accused namely Bhim
::: Downloaded
punishable
under Sections 328 , 222 , 223 , 224 and 114 of the Indian Penal Code
1860 (hereinafter referred to as ‘ IPC ’).
C. After ... petitioners were found guilty for the offence punishable under Section
222 IPC vide judgment and order dated 9.11.2006 and the petitioner
Section 426 in Criminal Procedure Code , 1898, using its inherent power under Section 561A of the Cr.P.C. 1898. Where the accused were alleged ... Section 426 Cr.P.C. 1898 are similar to Section 389 (1) of the present Cr.P.C . It may be noted that in Pampapathy
prosecution that statement of Mela Ram home
guard official under Section 164 Cr.P.C. was also recorded
before Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate ... read with
Section 120-B , 201 , 202 , 218 and 222 of Indian Penal Code.
Learned trial Court charged other co-accused namely Bhim
::: Downloaded
petitioners under
Sections 406 , 418 and 120-B of the Indian Penal Code
(hereinafter referred to as ' IPC ') and sentenced them ... Indian Penal Code and by
referring to Section 222(2) of Code of Criminal Procedure,
convicted the petitioners under Section 418 of Indian Penal
Code
Cr.P.C.
17. In the case on hand also punishment provided
for offence under Sections 307 and 326 IPC is same ... Cr.P.C. The trial Court erred in convicting
appellant - accused No. 1 for offence under Section 326 of
IPC instead of convicting