Charges framed under section : 279/304A/471/474 IPC
g The plea of accused : Pleaded not guilty
h Arguments heard ... dropped and charge u/s. 474 was added. Thus,
charge u/s. 279/304A/471/474 IPC were eventually framed upon
Section 420 IPC, Section 471 read with
Section 467 IPC, Section 468 IPC and
Section 474 IPC ... Section 474 IPC would only apply to
those cases where documents described in Section 466
IPC or 467 IPC
offences
punishable under Sections 467 , 468 , 471 , 120-B and 474 IPC as
the same is not compoundable.
(2 of 5)
[CRLMP ... offences punishable under Sections 420 , 467 , 468 , 471 120-B
and 474 IPC in the trial court wherein the trial is pending against
alleged offences punishable under Sections 420 , 446 , 468 , 473 and 474 IPC ... herein to prove the offences under Section 466 , 468 , 473 and 474 IPC.
8.Yet another contention of the petitioners that even
substantive offences U/Sec. 419, 420, 468, 471, 474 IPC
and Section 13(2) r/w Section ... charged with the
offences punishable u/s 419, 420, 468 and 474 IPC . Accused
persons Mukesh Jain(A1), Anil Dhall
document is a forged one.
The essential ingredient of Section 474 IPC are as
follows:-
(I) That the accused committed forgery ... forged document.
46. As far as offence under section 474 IPC is concerned, the
prime requirement is that a person should
revisionist
was framed for the offences punishable under Sections 474 / 473 / 34 of
Indian Penal Code (in short ' IPC ... been recovered from the possession of the
revisionist. Offence under Section 474 IPC does not attract and only
offence under Section 473 IPC
judgment was : 14.05.2018
pronounced.
7. Offence complained of : 467/468/471/474 IPC
or proved.
8. Plea of accused. : Pleaded not guilty ... accused
Kapil Anand for the offences u/s 467 / 468 / 471 / 474 IPC on 07.07.2008.
Since the accused pleaded not guilty and claimed
under section 466 or 467 IPC ,
charge u/s. 474 IPC cannot be framed. It has been argued that there ... therefore, Ld. Trial Court
has erred in framing charge u/s. 474 IPC. It has been further argued that
one Rachna Nigam
accused/applicant of the offences
punishable under sections 466 & 474 IPC, but affirmed the
conviction under other sections. Hence this revision ... lower appellate Court
acquitting the accused/applicant under Section 466 & 474 IPC and
keeping his conviction and sentence under other sections intact