C.C. Alavi Haji vs Palapetty Muhammed & Anr on 18 May, 2007
CHANDCRIC 6, 2007 (3) SCC (CRI) 236, (2007) 2 ORISSA LR 384, (2007) 2 GUJ LH 512, (2007) 2 BOMCR(CRI) 22, (2007) 55 ALLINDCAS
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 10362 (2.44 seconds)Manoj Sharma vs State & Ors on 16 October, 2008
mentioned that under Section 320(1) Cr.P.C. certain
offences in the IPC can be compounded by the persons mentioned ... compounded with the permission of the Court. In fact, Section 320(9)
Cr.P.C. expressly states that no offence shall be compounded except
State Of Orissa vs Debendra Nath Padhi on 29 November, 2004
case under Section 302 read with other provisions of the
Indian Penal Code . We may also note that the decisions cited by learned
counsel ... about 3 years back and the offence is under
Section 302 Indian Penal Code and in Criminal Appeal No.46 of 2004
charges were framed
State (N.C.T. Of Delhi) vs Navjot Sandhu@ Afsan Guru on 4 August, 2005
accused persons on 14.5.2002. Charges
were framed under various sections of Indian Penal Code (for short ' IPC '), the
Prevention of Terrorism ... taking cognizance
of any offence punishable under Chapter VI of the Indian Penal Code except
with the previous sanction of the Central Government
A.R. Antulay vs R.S. Nayak & Anr on 29 April, 1988
others for offences under ss. 161
and 165 of the Indian Penal Code and s. 5 of the Criminal
Law Amendment Act, 1952 and also ... 384 and 420 read
with ss. 109 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code.
The Special Judge issued process to the appellant.
Later, the Special
Aparna Bhat vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 18 March, 2021
offences punishable under sections 452 , 354A3 , 323 and 506 of
the Indian Penal Code ( IPC ). The case was investigated and a charge sheet ... accused alleged to have
committed offences under Sections 376 , 420 , 506 IPC and Section 66-B of the
Information Technology
The State Of Punjab vs Gurmit Singh & Ors on 16 January, 1996
January, 1996
Equivalent citations: 1996 AIR 1393, 1996 SCC (2) 384, (1996) 1 SCJ 566, AIR 1996 SUPREME COURT 1393, 1996 (2) SCC 384 ... Section 376-C or Section 376-D of the
Indian Penal Code shall be conducted in
camera :
Provided that the presiding judge
Vishaka & Ors vs State Of Rajasthan & Ors on 13 August, 1997
CHANDCRIC 112, (1997) 24 CRILT 455, (1997) 7 JT 384 (SC), 1997 SCC(CRI) 932, (2013) 3 KANT LJ 546, 1998 (1) BLJR ... Proceedings:
Where such conduct amounts to
a specific offence under the
Indian Penal Code or under any
other law the employer shall
initiate appropriate action
Navtej Singh Johar vs Union Of India Ministry Of Law And ... on 6 September, 2018
Bench of
this Court to the said penal provision, that is, Section 377 of the
Indian Penal Code, in Suresh Kumar Koushal and another ... Constitution of India and further to declare Section 377 of
the Indian Penal Code (for short, ― IPC ‖) to be unconstitutional. When
the said
Minu Rout & Anr vs Satya Pradyumna Mohapatra & Ors on 2 September, 2013
SUPP) 62, 2014 (1) SCC (CRI) 384, (2014) 2 MAH LJ 534, (2014) 117 CUT LT 256, (2014) 2 MPLJ ... offences punishable under Sections 279 read with
Section 302 of IPC read with the provisions of the M.V. Act . The Insurance
Company