Icici Securities Ltd, Mumbai vs Dcit Rg 4(1), Mumbai on 19 March, 2018
2016
the usage Bank's agent network for marketing the various IPO's. The
assessee has not made TDS as applicable
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 198 (0.82 seconds)Dcit Cen Cir 8(1), Mumbai vs Indra Gaggar, Mumbai on 30 November, 2016
material was there to indicate that Devan Mehta
was engaged in manipulating IPOs. We also found that during the course of search
statement ... thus the AO noted that the
assessee was involved in managing the IPO to which private limited companies and
Mr. Suresh Gaggar were privy
Ramesh Jaisinghani,Mumbai vs Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax ... on 10 October, 2025
under "offer for sale at the time of initial Public Offering
(IPO);
Provisions of Explanation to section ... 2025
Ramesh Jaisinghani
company‟s Initial Public Offer (IPO). These shares were
transferred from his demat account to the merchant banker‟s
escrow account
Zarah Rafique Malik,Mumbai vs Ito (Int Tax) Ward-3(2)(1), Mumbai on 10 March, 2026
proportionate Initial Public Offer (IPO) expenses and Portfolio
Management Services (PMS) expenses. The appeal relates to A.Y.2022-23.
2. The brief facts ... grounds.
6. Ld. Counsel for the appellant submitted that the IPO was for both issue of fresh
shares by the company i.e. Metro Brands
Ags Transact Technologies ... vs Dcit Circle 6(1)(1), Aayakar Bhavan ... on 17 February, 2025
Technologies Ltd 2
ITA No. 4653/MUM/2024
1. Disallowance of Aborted IPO Expenditure ... Appeals), National Faceless Appeal
Centre (NFAC), erred in confirming the disallowance of IPO expenditure
Everest Kanto Cylinder Ltd, Mumbai vs Assessee
financial year
2005-06 from the Initial Public Offer( in short 'IPO'), which has been
accepted by the appellate orders in the assessment ... year 2006-07,
wherein it was held that the funds raised from IPO were utilized for
making the investments. It was further submitted that without
Purshottam G Budhwani, Mumbai vs Department Of Income Tax on 21 October, 2015
brief are that the assessee is dealing in shares. He was applying IPO in the
name of different persons. A search was undertaken ... contravention of the rules and was manipulating the allotment of shares in
IPO and therefore, the expenses pertaining to such illegal activity cannot be
allowed
Amar H Patel Huf, Mumbai vs Assessee on 14 September, 2016
Long
term capital gain or loss. Also appellant has made application in IPO
under the category of Retail Investor. Appellant was having shares as
investment ... Software
Solutions Limited which were allotted to the assessee in IPO which were
allotted on 17-09-2005 and sold
Rajkamal R. Bajaj, Mumbai vs Assessee on 7 January, 2015
assessee contended that the
assessee sold shares of 33 scrips in IPO and sale transactions for
shares acquired under IPO are only ... shares held for short term is 34 days for
shares acquired by IPO and 36 days for shares acquired in
secondary market. A strong plea
Vks Projects Limited, Mumbai vs Income Tax Officer 15(3)(4), Mumbai on 4 November, 2022
2018(A.Y.2013-14)
VKS PROJECTS LTD.
the Act pertaining to IPO related expenses, addition of
Rs.1,51,83,347/- as disallowance ... claimed expenses of
Rs.2,03,45,678/- alleged to be IPO related expenses and that
the assessee company has incurred expenses