into sections to facilitate analysis. They are:
A The Appeal
B The IPO, SEBI’s Investigation and the criminal complaint
C Application for Compounding ... been called into question in these proceedings.
3
PART B
B The IPO, SEBI’s Investigation and the criminal complaint
2 The appellant
which had the
consequence of bringing all the Industries Promotion Officers (IPOs) within the
zone of consideration for promotion to Class-II service and their ... similarity in the nature of
their functions, the cadre of IPOs came to be formed by merging and
redesignating them both SAR, Industries and BLEO
other RIIs of allotment of their legitimate shares in
initial public offers (IPOs) of various companies and made an
unlawful gain ... manipulative practices to garner
shares meant for RIIs in the aforesaid IPOs and hence violated
Section 12A (a) , (b) and (c) of the SEBI
Eligibility:- JCOs of the APS and such WOs as have
passed the IPOs/IRMs examination of the P and T
Department.
3. Length of Commission ... parties. The JCOs of Armed Forces and Warrant Officers who
have passed IPO/IRM examination of Posts & Telegraph Department
are eligible for the grant
that when
there is an Initial Public Offerings (IPO), the shares are offered to
public at large in a particular manner so that even small ... concerned with issue of shares in the nature of IPO (there is
initial offering made by Jet Airways Limited and Infrastructure Development
Finance Company Limited
with
regard to certain fraudulent activities committed in the Initial Public
Offering (IPO) of the shares of Yes Bank Ltd., which opened for
subscription from ... pertained to the fraudulent activities committed in the Initial Public
Offering (IPO) of the shares of Infrastructure Development Finance
Company Ltd. (IDFC), which opened
hectares*. The last date for submission of the technical bid and
IPO was 16.12.2019. The NIT dated 25.10.2019 specifically invited the
expression of interest through ... tender notice 25.10.2019, the Respondent has not uploaded
the technical bid and IPO through the digital platform of MSTC. The
Respondent, however, submitted
Bharti Cellular
Limited which had come out with Initial Public Offer (IPO) that was opened
and it was not getting good response from the public
Appellant No.
8
1’s failure to bring out an IPO are clearly commercial disputes with no element
of criminality.
4.6 It was further submitted
granted to Mr. Bhave for his
lapses in dealing with the IPO Scam of 2005 when he was the Chairman
of NSDL.
Conclusions
