deleted the figures pertaining to
R\/
8
the said Subbarayanahalli Iron Ore Mines. However, even
after such deletion, Lokayukta found both the appellant as
well ... linsteadlVVl"o'f.ll writing
Thimmappanagundi Iron falsely Written
Subbarayanahalili -ironfgl The said documents
'3Pl3eal1'.._Ato_ fraudulent and dishonest
intention
based on
the above allegations is illegal and utter abuse of the
process of the Court.
4. Further, referring to the statement ... there are no
allegations that the petitioners herein have extracted
the Iron Ore from any particular place or removed them
to any other places
case, being the partners of the firm, namely, M/s. Dhanbad Iron Ore Conversion
Works, and it also appears that the consignment were ... matter.
Learned counsel for the petitioners has also submitted that the process under Section
82 of the Cr.P.C. was issued against the petitioners
Smt. Anita Maria Dias vs The State Of Maharashtra on 19 January, 2018
Equivalent citations
means of finance for the purpose of
procurement of iron ore, in OMP
No. 449/2007 petitioner-NAFED advanced an
Bail Appl. Nos. 1511/2011 ... amount of Rs.90.7 Crores for export of iron
ore. Similarly, in A.A. No. 73/2010 petitioner-
NAFED advanced
Smt. Anita Maria Dias vs The State Of Maharashtra on 19 January, 2018
Author: A
partner of a
firm, namely, M/s. Dhanbad Iron Ore Conversion Works, and it also appeared that the
consignment materials were to be transported ... case. It is also submitted that though the impugned order
shows that process under Section 82 of the Cr.P.C., has been issued against
that petitioner had
received cheques for supply of iron ore and also for
transportation of iron ore. The petitioner has not fulfilled his
3
contractual ... conflicting
decisions. Therefore, continuation of impugned proceedings
would be abuse of process of law.
5. In the result, I pass the following:
ORDER
The petition
Cbi vs . (1) S.K. Pathrella on 8 August, 2018
IN THE COURT OF Dr
