there is no irrationality or arbitrariness. In the
matter on hand, we do not find any illegality,
arbitrariness, irrationality or unreasonableness on the
part ... thresholds of
mala fides, intention to favour someone or bias,
arbitrariness, irrationality or perversity are met,
where a decision is taken purely on public interest
Judicial review of administrative action is intended to
prevent arbitrariness, irrationality, unreasonableness, bias and
mala fides. Its purpose is to check whether choice or decision ... fundamental rights is
duty-bound to interfere when there is arbitrariness, irrationality,
mala fides and bias. However, this Court in all the aforesaid
decisions
Apex Court has opined that it is intended to prevent arbitrariness,
irrationality, unreasonableness, bias and mala fide. The purpose is to check
whether the choice ... fundamental rights is
duty- bound to Interfere when there Is arbitrariness,
irrationality, mala fide, and bias. However, this Court
has cautioned time and again that
Condition and Specifications published by
Sports Authority of Gujarat is irrational,
arbitrary and is therefore bad in law.
(B)The Hon'ble Court ... declare
Clause No. 7.2 Exemption, sub-clause-II is
unjust, arbitrary, irrational, discriminatory
and violative Article 14 , 19. 21 of the
Constitution of India
Judicial review of administrative action is
intended to prevent arbitrariness, irrationality,
unreasonableness, bias and mala fides. Its purpose
is to check whether choice or decision ... interfere. The
threshold of mala fides, intention to favour someone or
arbitrariness, irrationality or perversity must be met
before the constitutional court interferes with
Excise Act, 1958, rules framed thereunder, being arbitrary,
irrational and contrary to the Act and the Liquor Rules on the grounds detailed ... clauses framed in the Excise Policy 2021-22 are
totally irrational, arbitrary and against public policy, as such, liable to
quashed.
Page
interfere. The threshold of
mala fides, intention to favour someone or
arbitrariness, irrationality or perversity must be
met before the constitutional Court interferes
with ... there is no irrationality or arbitrariness. In the
matter on hand, we do not find any illegality, arbitrariness,
irrationality or unreasonableness on the part
favour someone; or where the
process adopted or decision made is arbitrary and irrational that the
court can say: "the decision is such that
deviation in the terms of the NIT is not arbitrary,
irrational, unreasonable, mala fide or biased, the Courts will not
judicially review the decision taken ... deviation in the terms of the
NIT is not arbitrary, irrational, unreasonable,
mala fide or biased, the Courts will not
judicially review the decision taken
challenged the
constitutional validity of the 2nd Amendment Act, 2009 being
arbitrary, irrational, ultra vires and violative of Articles ... discriminatory classification and not on the grounds of such
action being arbitrary, irrational or unreasonable.
22. Mr. Ram Jethmalani, learned senior counsel
vehemently contended that
