Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 67 (0.66 seconds)

V. Mallikarjunaiah vs H.C. Goowramma on 30 July, 1996

mind, therefore, there is considerable substance in the argument that decrees voiding marriages can only be passed on the grounds or in the situations ... therefore, the marriage does subsist irrespective of this irregularity, which may be termed as a procedural irregularity alone, that then the sole purpose of enacting
Karnataka High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 3 - Full Document

Sridhar G. Jindgade Alias S.G. Jingade ... vs Smt. Satyavathi on 21 January, 2000

evidence is not permitted. There is overwhelming evidence establishing that both the marriages viz., marriage between the complainant and A-1 and the marriage between ... prevailing in their community and all essential ceremonies were performed validating the marriages. The second marriage being performed with due observance of all the religious
Karnataka High Court Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - B N Mallikarjuna - Full Document

Sri M H Devaraja vs Smt M B Sheela on 13 June, 2024

following three grounds: 1) That respondent had attained delayed puberty and irregular menstruation cycles and that was suppressed before the marriage and she was incapable ... given in marriage to the cousin of the respondent and their marriages were solemnized in the same community hall on the same
Karnataka High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Smt Latha vs N C Thippeswamy on 13 January, 2023

been taking care of her daughters who are now of marriageable age. She submits that the respondent is a land owner and has got good ... there is an order for payment of maintenance, the respondent has been irregular in payment of the same. Therefore, the appellant was constrained to initiate
Karnataka High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 Next