when he has already four, the marriage is not
void, but merely irregular". (See Mulla's Mahomedan Law,18th
Edition, paragraph 25S, page ... husband if he
contracts another marriage, leave alone 3 or 4 other
marriages. It shows, unmistakably, that section 125
overrides the personal
amount of paucity of evidence to prove the solemnization of both the marriages of accused No. 1 with the de facto complainant and accused ... proof of solemnization of marriage of any one of these two marriages would automatically defeat the charge under Section
marriages of both the daughters and thus, it cannot be believed that the same amount was spent in both the marriages. In such circumstances ... failed to consider this aspect of the case and thus, committed material irregularity and jurisdictional error.
It was argued by the learned counsel for revisionist
Fire-
worshipper is not permissible. According to Mulla, such marriage is
irregular. But according to Fyzee, such a marriage is totally void.
Under Shia ... Keeping in mind the peculiarity of law relating to
marriages in our country, the Special Marriage Act, 1954 (for short
when he was already four, the marriage is not void, but merely irregular". (See : Rules's Mahommadan Law, 18th Edition, paragraph 225, page ... husband if he contracts another marriage, leave alone 3 or 4 other marriages. It shows unmistakably, that Section 125 over rides the personal
offences were committed during the course of one transaction especially when the marriages were performed one after the other and not simultaneously. Thus, the filing ... petitioners. Under the circumstances, it cannot be said to be a mere irregularity but an illegality as there is no provision in the Code
A.Subash Babu vs State Of A.P.& Anr on 21 July, 2011
Equivalent
Kamalanantha And Ors vs State Of Tamil Nadu on 5 April, 2005
Equivalent citations: AIR
T.N.Misra (Triloki Nath Mishra) & Ors ... vs State Of U.P. & Ors
Ashok Kumar Todi vs Kishwar Jahan & Ors on 18 May, 2010
Author: Bhaskar Bhattacharya
