rested on the words of Section 13 of the Civil Procedure Code, viz., under whom they or any of them claim, overlooks what was pointed ... litigation are left un provided for thereby. (See also Stokes Anglo-Indian Code, Vol. II, at p. 393.)
22. The view which we have taken
repute and is admissible for the purpose of Section 110 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and this provision of the law being an exception ... pointed out in Rai Isri Pershad v. Queen Empress (1895) I.L.R. 23 Cal. 621, a case which is frequently quoted
repute and is admissible for the purpose of Section 110 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, this provision of the law being an exception ... petition of (8). But as was pointed out in Rai Isri Pershad v. Queen-Empress 23 C. 621 a case which is frequently quoted
Mahboob Sirfraz Vanth Sri Rajah ... vs Sri Rajah Venkatadri Appa Rao Bahadur ... on 11 January
Muthukrishnien And Ors. vs Viraraghava Iyer And Anr. on 30 August, 1912
Equivalent citations: (1912
Muthukrishnien And Ors. vs Viraragava Iyer And Anr. on 30 August, 1912
Equivalent citations: 16IND
Harikrishna Naiko vs Emperor on 2 July, 1918
Equivalent citations: 47IND. CAS.277
JUDGMENT
Kumarasami
Adilakshmi And Anr. vs Venkataramayya on 26 September, 1902
Equivalent citations: (1903)13MLJ359
JUDGMENT
Arnold
