read with Rule 17 of the Army Rules,
would be double jeopardy, which is not permissible. However, the
High Court did not agree with ... actually illegal
and bad in law and would tantamount to double jeopardy.
4.2 It is submitted by the learned counsel appearing on behalf
prosecution of the applicants is barred by the principle of "double Jeopardy".
6.6 Apart from the aforesaid legal submissions, it is also submitted ... putting the personal liberty and/or the property of the citizen in jeopardy by illegal and improper use of the power or there is abuse
contrary to the law,
blatantly against the principle of 'double jeopardy' and infringes their
right of not to be prosecuted again ... Prosecutor has supported the impugned order.
8. The principle of "Double Jeopardy" surges from Article 20(2) of the
Constitution of India, which
becomes
disproportionate and unwarranted.
30-- He adds that it also constitutes double jeopardy.
Gagan Harsh Sharma and Anr. vs. State of
Maharashtra ... Advocate Mr. Desai taking up the challenge on
the ground of double jeopardy, submitted that in such matters
where the reputation of company auditor
Cancellation of promotion let to double jeopardy thereby punishing the petitioner twice
for same charges as the act of cancellation specifically violates the provision ... such
erroneous promotion order, same was cancelled. The question of double jeopardy does not
arise. The promotion order was purely temporary under Regulation
becomes
disproportionate and unwarranted.
30-- He adds that it also constitutes double jeopardy.
Gagan Harsh Sharma and Anr. vs. State of
Maharashtra ... Advocate Mr. Desai taking up the challenge on
the ground of double jeopardy, submitted that in such matters
where the reputation of company auditor
enunciates the principle of autrefois convict" or "double
jeopardy". The roots of that principle are to be found in the well
established ... jury on the issue is whether
the defendant has previously been in jeopardy in respect of the
charge on which he is arrainged
becomes
disproportionate and unwarranted.
30-- He adds that it also constitutes double jeopardy.
Gagan Harsh Sharma and Anr. vs. State of
Maharashtra ... Advocate Mr. Desai taking up the challenge on
the ground of double jeopardy, submitted that in such matters
where the reputation of company auditor
becomes
disproportionate and unwarranted.
30-- He adds that it also constitutes double jeopardy.
Gagan Harsh Sharma and Anr. vs. State of
Maharashtra ... Advocate Mr. Desai taking up the challenge on
the ground of double jeopardy, submitted that in such matters
where the reputation of company auditor
becomes
disproportionate and unwarranted.
30-- He adds that it also constitutes double jeopardy.
Gagan Harsh Sharma and Anr. vs. State of
Maharashtra ... Advocate Mr. Desai taking up the challenge on
the ground of double jeopardy, submitted that in such matters
where the reputation of company auditor
