Srinidhi Karti Chidambaram vs The Deputy Director Of Income Tax ... on 12 May, 2020
Srinidhi Karti Chidambaram vs The Deputy Director Of Income Tax ... on 12 May, 2020
Equivalent
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 1316 (1.98 seconds)Ganesh Kumar Ram vs The Union Of India Through Central ... on 30 March, 2022
Member of the Jharkhand Public
Service Commission, sister of one of the members of the then member of
Jharkhand Public Service Commission. It is further ... Jharkhand Public Service Commission Rules of Procedure,
2002 and that though the petitioner only secured 107 marks in Paper III of
the Jharkhand Eligibility Test
Suchita Bara vs The Union Of India Through Central ... on 29 March, 2022
Member of the Jharkhand Public Service
Commission, sister of one of the members of the then member of Jharkhand
Public Service Commission. It is further ... Jharkhand Public Service Commission Rules of Procedure, 2002 and that
though the petitioner only secured 93 marks in Paper III of the Jharkhand
Baleshwar Ram vs The Union Of India Through Central ... on 29 March, 2022
Member of the Jharkhand Public Service
Commission, sister of one of the members of the then member of Jharkhand
Public Service Commission. It is further ... Jharkhand Public Submits Service Commission Rules of Procedure, 2002
and that though the petitioner secured 100 marks on paper III of the
Jharkhand Eligibility Test
Suprabha Tuti vs The Union Of India Through Central ... on 29 March, 2022
Member of the Jharkhand Public Service
Commission, sister of one of the members of the then member of Jharkhand
Public Service Commission. It is further ... Jharkhand Public Service Commission Rules of Procedure, 2002 and that
though the petitioner only received 93 marks in Paper III of the Jharkhand
Eligibility Test
Prakash Thakur vs The State Of Jharkhand on 1 December, 2021
counsel for the petitioner submits that
without receiving service report of summons, process of section 82 Cr.P.C. has
been issued. He submits that ... that service report has not been received which has been recorded in order
date 07.03.2005 itself and by that order process under section 82
Sugesan Transport Pvt. Ltd vs The Assistant Commissioner Of Police on 17 August, 2016
Section 154(3) , 156(3) and 190 read with Section 200 , Cr.P.C. are available in the statute and they have been reiterated ... cross-purposes. Monitoring does not mean supervision. Under Section 172 Cr.P.C., the Magistrate has the power to call for the case diary
Pritam Singh Chaudhary & Another vs State Of Himachal Pradesh & Others on 6 April, 2015
Downloaded on - 15/04/2017 17:56:49 :::HCHP
16
effecting service of the notice on the informant. But we
do not think this ... report on the
informant. Moreover, in any event, the difficulty of
service of notice on the informant cannot possibly
provide any justification for depriving
State Of Jharkhand Through Deputy ... vs Sanjay Mondal And Ors on 10 April, 2013
irregularity.
29. The primary object of the provisions of Section 391 CrPC is the
prevention of a guilty man's escape through some careless ... ends
of justice. However, the provisions of Section 391 CrPC cannot be pressed
into service in order to fill up lacunae in the prosecution case
Dr. Nand Kishore Prasad vs State Of Jharkhand And Ors. on 16 April, 2004
counter-affidavit has been filed by the respondent Nos. 2 and 3, Jharkhand High Court and the Registrar (Vigilance) of the Court. The respondents ... background of compromise, although there is no such provision in the Code of Criminal Procedure . Similarly in S.T. Case No. 28-A/2002