Magistrate
has failed to appreciate that both the partners in the
Joint Venture had invested an equal sum of money
Crl. Revision. No. 261/2020 ... said land with malafide intention does not arise as
both the Joint Venture partners have equally invested
their respective shares and no issue of cheating
defendant no. 2, 3 and 4 to set-up a joint venture project?
If so, whether the plaintiff committed default in
complying with the terms ... amount
equivalent whereof would be his contribution / investment towards the
joint venture. Furthermore it was also taken umbrage that the previous
consent of the board
defendant no. 2, 3 and 4 to set-up a joint venture project?
If so, whether the plaintiff committed default in
complying with the terms ... amount
equivalent whereof would be his contribution / investment towards the
joint venture. Furthermore it was also taken umbrage that the previous
consent of the board
defendant no. 2, 3 and 4 to set-up a joint venture project?
If so, whether the plaintiff committed default in
complying with the terms ... amount
equivalent whereof would be his contribution / investment towards the
joint venture. Furthermore it was also taken umbrage that the previous
consent of the board
Professional Audio-Visual
Integration Equipment. Whereas the Defendant
Company is a Joint Venture between CS Direkt and
Exhibitions Pvt. Ltd. and Modern Stage Service,
engaged ... quasi partnership where the two entities
jointly undertook the transaction in question for mutual profit and the
joint venture had binded itself to the various
converted into a grant. He further stated that it was a
joint venture wherein both parties had to invest in terms of
understanding and exploit ... that the complainant,
TIFAC, and Accused No. 1 entered into a joint venture to
develop the "Stevia" product with shared profitability and patent
converted into a grant. He further stated that it was a
joint venture wherein both parties had to invest in terms of
understanding and exploit ... that the complainant,
TIFAC, and Accused No. 1 entered into a joint venture to
develop the "Stevia" product with shared profitability and patent
converted into a grant. He further stated that it was a
joint venture wherein both parties had to invest in terms of
understanding and exploit ... that the complainant,
TIFAC, and Accused No. 1 entered into a joint venture to
develop the "Stevia" product with shared profitability and patent
converted into a grant. He further stated that it was a
joint venture wherein both parties had to invest in terms of
understanding and exploit ... that the complainant,
TIFAC, and Accused No. 1 entered into a joint venture to
develop the "Stevia" product with shared profitability and patent
converted into a grant. He further stated that it was a
joint venture wherein both parties had to invest in terms of
understanding and exploit ... that the complainant,
TIFAC, and Accused No. 1 entered into a joint venture to
develop the "Stevia" product with shared profitability and patent
