Inspector Of Police & Ors vs N.M.T. Joy Immaculate on 5 May, 2004
Author: G.P. Mathur
Bench: Chief Justice , G.P. Mathur ... Inspector of Police & Ors.
RESPONDENT:
N.M.T. Joy Immaculate
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 05/05/2004
BENCH:
CJI & G.P. Mathur.
JUDGMENT:
JUDGMENT
Joy Immaculate vs State Rep. By on 11 April, 2002
Author: M. Karpagavinayagam
Bench: M. Karpagavinayagam
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated ... Joy Immaculate .. Petitioner
vs.
1. State rep. by
The Inspector of Police,
P1 Pulianthope Police Station,
Chennai.
2. The Inspector of Police,
P4 Basin Bridge
Represented by Inspector of Police and Ors. v. N.M.T. Joy Immaculate of the said judgment and in Para 7 of the judgment ... Represented by Inspector of Police and Ors. v. N.M.T. Joy Immaculate . The learned A.P.P. heavily relied on Paragraph
decision
of the Supreme Court in State
Vs. N.M.T. Joy Immaculate reported in (2004) 5 SCC 729 reported ... question, in the case of
State Vs. N.M.T. Joy
Immaculate reported in (2004) 5 SCC 729.
In N.M.T. Joy Immaculate (supra
Inspector Of Police & Ors vs N.M.T. Joy Immaculate on 5 May, 2004
Author: Ar. Lakshmanan
Bench: Ar. Lakshmanan
CASE NO.:
Appeal ... Inspector of Police & Ors.
RESPONDENT:
N.M.T. Joy Immaculate
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 05/05/2004
BENCH:
Dr. AR. Lakshmanan.
JUDGMENT
State Rep. By
Inspector Of Police v. N.M.T. Joy Immaculate, (2004) 5 SCC 729 wherein
it was held that an order of remand ... wherein the Supreme Court has
reiterated the position in NMT Joy Immaculate that an order granting remand
of the accused persons is an interlocutory order
Supreme Court in State & Ors. vs. N.M.T. Joy Immaculate,3 the
relevant portion of which reads as follows :
"13. Section ... Metropolitan Magistrate granting police custody
of the accused Joy Immaculate for one day."
(emphasis supplied)
15. Reference in this behalf is also made
though CBI
reported in 1980 Supp.SCC 92, State Vs. NMT Joy Immaculate reported in
( 2004) 5 SCC 729, Girish Kumar Suneja Vs. CBI reported ... Page No.# 14/44
the pronouncement of the Supreme Court in Joy Immaculate, (supra), wherein
in paragraph 8 the expression 'interlocutory order
represented by Inspector of Police & Ors. Vs. N. M.
T. Joy Immaculate, reported in (2004) 5 SCC 729; and
d) Vakeel Ahmad Vs. State ... represented by Inspector of Police & Ors. Vs. N. M.
T. Joy Immaculate (Supra), the question before the Hon'ble Court was
whether
Supreme Court in State and Ors. v. NMT Joy Immaculate, reported in (2004) 5 SCC 729. It is also submitted by the learned Special Public ... down by the Supreme Court in State and Anr. v. NMT Joy Immaculate, reported in (2004) 5 SCC 729, especially para 13 thereof reads
