referred to the case of " State v.
N.M.T. Joy Immaculate " reported in (2004) 5 SCC 729.
12. Mr. Deepak Kumar, learned ... referred to the case of " State v. N.M.T.
Joy Immaculate " reported in (2004) 5 SCC 729, wherein it was held that
represented through Inspector of Police & Ors. vs.
N.M.T. JOY Immaculate by full bench of Hon'ble Supreme
Court as follows ... Metropolitan Magistrate granting police custody of
the accused Joy Immaculate for one day.
(underlining by me)
9. It is clear from the authority which also
represented by Inspector of Police and
Ors. Vs. N.M.T. Joy Immaculate 3 deprecated passing of
disparaging and strong remarks by the High Court
Inspector of Police and others V. N.M.T. Joy Immaculate, AIR 2004 Supreme Court 2282, wherein the Hon'ble Supreme Court has inter
Inspector of Police & Ors.
Vs. N.M.T. Joy Immaculate, (2004) 5 SCC 729 wherein it
was held that evidence obtained on an illegal
Supreme Court in " State
and Ors Vs. N.M.T Joy Immaculate 2004(5) SCC 729 has
observed that admissibility or otherwise
Supreme Court in " State
and Ors Vs. N.M.T Joy Immaculate 2004(5) SCC 729 has
observed that admissibility or otherwise
Supreme Court in " State
and Ors Vs. N.M.T Joy Immaculate 2004(5) SCC 729 has
observed that admissibility or otherwise
Supreme Court in " State
and Ors Vs. N.M.T Joy Immaculate 2004(5) SCC 729 has
observed that admissibility or otherwise
2017, 185/2017 & 186/2017,
● State and ors. v. NMT Joy Immaculate 2004 5 SCC 729;
APPRECIATION OF ARGUMENTS AND FINDINGS AS WELL
