would - pind this Tribunal py virtue of the 2
principles of judicial propriety.
9. In a batch of OAs ied by OA No.93/2019 ... hardly»
"necessary. to- emphasis 'that considerations: of.
judicial. propriety and: decorum 'require that
'SF a learned sifigle Judge hearing a@ matter
also argued the Company
Appeal from the perspective of "judicial propriety". He submits that the
proceedings of the said Company Petition ... contended by the Learned Counsel for the Appellant that judicial propriety,
demanded that when the matter was once marked as "part heard
assign cases and allot Benches but also the larger issue of
judicial propriety. The order directing issuance of notice
of contempt to the Chief Justice ... matter,
in a wholly unconnected judicial proceedings. In doing so he
transgressed all bounds of judicial propriety and
discipline.
The insinuations made by Shethna
Reliance Industries Limited, Mumbai vs Acit , Mumbai on 8 March, 2022
ITA Nos.1645 &
Code.
Constitution of India, Art. 141-Judicial propriety
warrants that decisions of the Supreme Court must be taken
as wholly binding on the High Courts ... direct authority of this Court stood
superseded. [349B-C]
3. Judicial propriety warrants that decisions of the
Supreme
342
Court must be taken wholly binding
Court should always be with reference to specific pleading
taken-Judicial propriety and doctrine of Stare Decisis,
explained.
HEADNOTE:
A partition took place between ... right of co-ownership.
[813D]
3:1. The judicial propriety or decorum warrants a Judge
not to hold contrary to the decision of the same
broader one but in certain cases judicial propriety would be an impediment
and the present case is one where the judicial propriety comes ... jurisdiction under Order XLI Rule 27(1)(b), for the judicial
propriety becomes an impediment and, therefore, there is no necessity to
advert
these
petitions being orders passed in exercise of judicial functions, its
validity or propriety cannot be questioned in a petition under Article ... However, ultimately the
learned counsel submitted that in keeping with the judicial propriety
and discipline, the issue ought to be referred by the learned Single
Land Acquisition Act, 1894, the escalation was deemed
disproportionate and against judicial propriety.
8. With regard to the second reference in Umesh Chandra v.
State3 ... while deciding the aforementioned two land
acquisition references was bereft of judicial propriety, settled judicial
norms and was actuated by extraneous considerations. Additionally,
the High
present case. The order of reference infringes the settled principles of judicial propriety as the learned Single Judge was bound by the law settled ... principles of law, we are of the considered view that the judicial propriety expects that the decision of a larger Bench normally could
