hardly necessary to emphasize that considerations of
judicial propriety and decorum require that if a learned single Judge
hearing a matter is inclined to take ... rule and no authority.
There can also be no dispute that judicial propriety demands
that where a Bench does not agree with the decision
argued that, as such, judicial propriety
demands that the court should maintain its
decorum and dignity and should not pass any
order, which may well ... Vidur Impex (supra) is
concerned, there is no question of judicial
propriety involved here, since there is no
conflict of decision in the present case
existence,
whether by any principle of comity of courts or judicial propriety.
24. Once MAT 1898 of 1997 was dismissed and the order dated September ... from what was decided by the Coordinate bench in that
case . Judicial propriety demands it.
(5) The Memorandum dated July 21, 1990 is a draft
certainty of law. Judicial
decorum, no less than legal propriety forms the basis of judicial
procedure and it must be respected at all costs ... question of law, it must,
7
in keeping with principles of judicial propriety and decorum, either
follow the decision with which it disagrees or refer
certainty of law. Judicial
decorum, no less than legal propriety forms the basis of judicial
procedure and it must be respected at all costs ... question of law, it must,
in keeping with principles of judicial propriety and decorum, either
follow the decision with which it disagrees or refer
that the benefit of the statute cannot be enlarged by way of
judicial interpretation in the garb of treating the same as beneficial legislation
beyond ... index of 2018 with the price index of
1994.
69. Moreover, judicial propriety demands that a Bench of a high court/Supreme
Court should
subsequent view which becomes binding.
The values of judicial decorum and propriety have been endlessly stressed
upon by the more experienced and the sagacious ... Pimputkar case. It is hardly necessary to emphasise
that considerations of judicial propriety and decorum require that if a
learned Single Judge hearing a matter
despite the pendency of civil matters relating to the
same property, judicial propriety would demand that the Tribunal stayed its hands till the
adjudication
Chief Justice or his designate,
some fundamental rules as to judicial propriety need to be established. The
discussion must be prefaced with a note that
since the Supreme Court is in active seisin of the matter, judicial
propriety demands that in deference to the primacy of the Supreme Court
