Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

Dr. Subramanian Swamy vs J. Jayalalitha And Ors. on 15 November, 1993 Equivalent citations: (1994

Benches of the Tribunal have been placed, in order to maintain judicial propriety, the Tribunal ought to have followed them or in the event ... hardly necessary to emphasize that considerations of judicial propriety and decorum require that if a learned Single Judge hearing a matter is inclined to take

necessity which it would otherwise not countenance on the touchstone of judicial propriety. State differently, the doctrine of necessity makes it imperative for the authority ... necessity, which it would otherwise not countenance on the touchstone of judicial propriety. Stated differently, the doctrine of necessity makes it imperative for the authority

case. It is hardly necessary to emphasise that considerations of judicial propriety and decorum require that if a learned single Judge hearing a matter ... observed that when there was an existing order of Division Bench, judicial propriety demands that the learned single Judge dealing with the matter ought

supports the finality of judgments but also underscores the ideals of judicial propriety and fairness. 145. There are, four situations where in second proceedings between ... fairness, ensuring that the judicial system remains an instrument of justice rather than a platform for procedural manipulation. Judicial propriety demands that courts maintain

Interference by the learned Single Judge at that stage is subversive of judicial discipline. The High Court was aware that the SLPs against the orders ... failed. By passing the impugned order on 7-4-1994, judicial propriety has been sacrificed. After the dismissal of the special leave petitions by this

that rule. But quite apart from any rule, considerations of judicial propriety and decorum ought never to be ignored by courts in such matters ... Court observed. If, as we pointed out there, considerations of judicial decorum and legal propriety require that Division Benches should not themselves pronounce decisions

State of Kerala v, Vasudevan Nair , 1974 KLT 617 - "Judicial propriety, dignity and decorum demand that being the highest judicial tribunal in the country

could still be unity of possession till actual division is effected. Judicial propriety required the later Division Bench to refer the matter to a Larger

learned Principal Sessions Judge, Madras, is attacked on the ground of propriety Judicial discipline, non- consideration of the gravity of the case and other circumstances ... tamper the witnesses and the same situation when continued, the judicial discipline propriety and comity demanded, impugned order should not have been passed reversing