been taken purely on public interest,
the court ordinarily should exercise judicial restraint."
5. Sri Prabhuling K. Navadgi, the learned Additional Solicitor
General appearing ... stage
should have exercised caution. If the courts would exercise power
of judicial review in such a manner it is most likely to cause
confusion
there cannot be any straight jacket formula in this regard.
The judicial restraint itself imposes the extraordinary
power vested in the Court, which is sufficient
order that appropriate
judgment be rendered on judicial enquiry into the alleged unlawful
restraint". The form of the writ employed is "We command
illegality that
has been committed by the authorities by way of
judicial review. For this proposition, judgment of the
Hon'ble Apex Court ... Apex Court
in Tata Ceullular 's case that these restraints bear
hallmarks of judicial control over administrative action
and the judicial review is concerned
illegality that
has been committed by the authorities by way of
judicial review. For this proposition, judgment of the
Hon'ble Apex Court ... Apex Court
in Tata Ceullular 's case that these restraints bear
hallmarks of judicial control over administrative action
and the judicial review is concerned
illegality that has been committed by the
13
authorities by way of judicial review. For this
proposition, judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court ... Apex Court in Tata
Ceullular's case that these restraints bear hallmarks of
judicial control over administrative action and the
judicial review is concerned
manner of any restraint
for using the said road for morning and
evening walk for the residents of Judicial
Layout and Allalsandra Village and also ... manner of any restraint for using the said road for morning
and evening walk for the residents of Judicial Layout and
Allasandra village and also
under Sections 9 , 10 and 11 of Child Marriage
2
Restraint Act and under Sections 4 , 6 and 8 of POCSO
Act.
This petition coming ... Court Government Pleader for the
respondent-State.
2. The petitioner is in judicial custody in Crime
No.79/2017 registered by the respondent-police
contemplated by Article 141. Uniformity and consistency are core of
judicial discipline. But that which escapes in the judgment without any
occasion is not ratio ... authority of a general nature binding as a
precedent. Restraint in dissenting or overruling is for sake of stability
and uniformity but rigidity beyond reasonable
Government Of Karnataka vs Ngef Limited (In Liquidation) on 22 June, 2017
Author: Vineet Kothari
