ground for not
entertaining the writ petition filed by Appellant was judicial restraint on the
part of the court. It refused to intervene ... case of this nature, the Court should normally exercise judicial restraint
unless illegality or arbitrariness on the part of the employer is apparent
question which has to be asked is what is the
scope of judicial review, and in a few special cases
the scope for the review ... SCALE 171)
In any event, the modern trend also points to judicial restraint in
administration action as has been held in Tata Cellular Vs. Union
meaning of Article 13 of the Constitution of
India.
JUDICIAL REVIEW:
The power of judicial review is now well-defined in a
series of decisions ... SCALE 171)
In any event, the modern trend also points to
judicial restraint in administration action as has been
held in Tata Cellular Vs. Union
Santosh Kumar Satishbhushan Bariyar vs State Of Maharashtra on 13 May, 2009
Author: S.B
that
the terms of the invitation to tender are not open to
judicial scrutiny and the courts cannot whittle
down the terms of the tender ... this Court held that the
modern trend points to judicial restraint in reviewing the administrative
action. The court does not sit as a court
Constitution of India
shall not interfere. It would exercise judicial restraint. It may be
erroneous but not illegal. It may not be just and proper
authority. The Court in a case of
this nature must exercise judicial restraint. It may be one thing to say that
having regard
this Court stated:
"46. While it is true that principles of judicial review apply to the
exercise by a government body of its contractual ... matter of judicial review:
"94. The principles deducible from the above are:
1) The modern trend points to judicial restraint in administrative action
D. Wren International Ltd. And Another vs Engineers India Ltd. And Others on 28 March
same decision the Court held as follows:
Observance of judicial restraint is currently the mood in England. The judicial power of review is exercise ... quash an administrative decision on its merits. These restraints bear the hallmarks of judicial control over administrative action."
33. Having regard to the fact
