Himalayan Wine & Others vs State Of H.P. & Others on 28 June, 2016
this case are :
"94. .......
(1) The modern trend points to judicial
restraint in administrative action.
(2) The Court does not sit as a court ... jurisdiction in such matters being limited, the
Court should normally exercise judicial restraint
::: Downloaded on - 28/09/2020 20:18:48 :::HCHP
13
unless illegality
this case are :
"94. .......
(1) The modern trend points to judicial restraint in
administrative action.
(2) The Court does not sit as a court ... jurisdiction
in such matters being limited, the Court should normally
exercise judicial restraint unless illegality or arbitrariness
on the part of the employer is apparent
Himalayan Wine & Others vs State Of H.P. & Others on 28 June, 2016
Himalayan Wine & Others vs State Of H.P. & Others on 28 June, 2016
Himalayan Wine & Others vs State Of H.P. & Others on 28 June, 2016
Himalayan Wine & Others vs State Of H.P. & Others on 28 June, 2016
Himalayan Wine & Others vs State Of H.P. & Others on 28 June, 2016
Himalayan Wine & Others vs State Of H.P. & Others on 28 June, 2016
Petrocorp Exploration Ltd. 18/3/1991."
73. Observance of judicial restraint is currently the
mood in England. The judicial power of review is
exercised ... deducible from the above are :
(1) The modem trend points to judicial restraint in
administrative action.
(2) The court does not sit as a court