para 10 of the order dated 06.07.2006 are not
warranted.
16. Judicial restraint and discipline are as necessary to the orderly
administration of justice ... possible that a particular judicial officer may be
consistently passing orders creating a suspicion of judicial conduct
which is not wholly or even partly attributable
Court enunciated the principle that the modern trend points to judicial restraint in administrative action. The Court does not sit as a court of appeal ... been taken purely on public interest, the Court ordinarily should exercise judicial restraint."
22.In Reliance Airport Developers (P) Ltd. V. Airports Authority
Since the present case pertains to the crucial doctrine of judicial
restraint, we are of the considered opinion that encroaching into the right ... would have agreed with Mr. B.B. Singh. The doctrine of
judicial restraint which has been emphasised repeatedly by this Court e.g.
in Aravali
financial, administrative or other considerations. The court must exercise judicial restraint and must ordinarily leave it to the executive authorities ... Laxmi Devi , (2008) 4 SCC 720 the court must maintain judicial restraint in matters relating to the legislative or executive domain."
(emphasis supplied
matter should be
minimal. The Court should normally exercise judicial restraint unless
illegality or arbitrariness on the part of the employer is apparent ... case of this nature, the Court should
normally exercise judicial restraint unless illegality or
arbitrariness on the part of the employer is apparent
scope of judicial review of administrative decisions
and exercise of powers in awarding contracts, thus :
(1) The modern trend points to judicial restraint in
administrative ... case of
this nature, the Court should normally exercise judicial
restraint unless illegality or arbitrariness on the part of
the employer is apparent
P. Vijayaraghavan vs The State on 10 April, 2017
Author: T.Mathivanan
Bench: T. Mathivanan
decisions of this Court which have
dealt with the scope of judicial review of award of contracts.
..........
21.2.In Tata Cellular Vs. Union ... scope of judicial review of administrative
decisions and exercise of powers in awarding contracts, thus:
?(1)The modern trend points to judicial restraint in
administrative
decisions of this Court which have
dealt with the scope of judicial review of award of contracts.
..........
21.2.In Tata Cellular Vs. Union ... scope of judicial review of administrative
decisions and exercise of powers in awarding contracts, thus:
?(1)The modern trend points to judicial restraint in
administrative
deducible from the above are:
(1) The modern trend points to judicial restraint in administrative action.
(2) The Court does not sit as a court ... Court enunciated the principle that the modern trend points to judicial restraint in administrative action. The Court does not sit as a court of appeal
