right by judicial review.
The judicial power of review is exercised to rein in any unbridled executive functioning. The restraint has two contemporary manifestations ... intent form of review than other administrative Bodies ? The arguments that judicial restraint in the exercise of the review function, are at least certain form
stretch of imagination can be termed as unreasonable.
13. The question of judicial review of administrative decisions relating to acceptance of tender and award ... administrative law, enunciated the principle that the modern trend points to judicial restraint in administrative action. The court does not sit as a Court
expeditious furtherance of the arbitral process, it cannot be gainsaid that wherever judicial intervention is statutorily permissible, the play and purport of the related provision ... primary objects of the Act, the restraint cannot logically be conceded a primacy to override the provisions permitting judicial intervention in the interest of ensuring
violated the fundamental essentials of judicial procedure in conducting the writ proceedings. The imputations exceeded all reasonable limits of restraint and in the circumstances were ... officials deputed by the State. We also took the assistance of three judicial officers towards scrutinizing the records. Such course of action
persons in power who hold the position of trust. Surprise was how judicial intervention can serve larger public interest. One would require multilayered blindfold ... Court held:
Ordinarily It is true that the court has imposed a restraint in its own wisdom on its exercise of jurisdiction under Article
Bongaigaon Refinery And ... vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. on 8 September, 2006
Equivalent
Itc Ltd. vs State Of Assam And Ors. on 17 November, 2006
Equivalent citations: (2007
Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. vs Shree Ganapati Rolling Mills (P.) Ltd. ... on 30
Smt. Khumanthem Ongbi Pangabam Ningol ... vs State Of Manipur And Ors. on 13 January, 2006
said power cannot be said to be a bald on without any restraint. The impugned order discloses' that the learned trial court directed ... reasons, rendered in violation of the well-known principles that a judicial order must contain reasons, and in violation of the mandatory provision of Rule
