ordinarily go into these considerations. The Court has to maintain judicial restraint and has to ordinarily defer to the opinion of the administrators, unless there ... Supreme Court observed:
(1)The modern trend points to judicial restraint in administrative action.
(2)The Court does not sit as a court of appeal
functions of another organ of the State. The courts must exercise judicial restraint in this connection.
24. In Asif Hameed v. State of Jammu ... exercise of powers by the legislature and executive is subject to judicial restraint, the only check on our own exercise of power is the self
domain of the Executive authorities.
14. This court must maintain judicial restraint and not take over the functions of the legislature or executive which ... certain that he is right. Judicial humility should therefore, prevail over judicial activism in this respect.
40. Judicial restraint is consistent with and complementary
functions of another organ of the State. The courts must exercise judicial restraint in this connection.
26. In Asif Hameed v. State of Jammu ... exercise of powers by the legislature and executive is subject to judicial restraint, the only check on our own exercise of power is the self
Supreme Court observed:
(1)The modern trend points to judicial restraint in administrative action.
(2)The Court does not sit as a court of appeal ... this court to interfere with its functioning. The court must exercise judicial restraint in this connection.
64. It is well settled that in academic/educational
police will be claiming parity with the Army. There must be judicial restraint in the matter of pay scales, creation of posts, grades, appointments, promotion ... effect creating all kinds of problems. Hence, the court should exercise judicial restraint and not interfere in such executive function vide Rama Muthuramalingam v. Deputy
three other conclusions arrived at in Tata Cellular. These conclusions suggest judicial restraint and non- interference by courts who should not substitute their view ... These conclusions are:
(1) The modern trend points to judicial restraint in administrative action.
(2) The court does not sit as a court of appeal
necessary significance. As pointed out in Tata Cellular
there must be judicial restraint in interfering with administrative
action. Ordinarily, the soundness of the decision taken ... questioned but the decision making
process can certainly be subject to judicial review. The
8
2016 (7) SCALE
comes to the Court
directing the State to expend amounts, judicial restraint is necessary.
26. The learned Additional Solicitor General referred to the recently
revised
limited extent, in issues of governance it has also to show judicial
restraint in some areas of governance, and this is one of them
