Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

Krishna Mahadevan @ Mahadevan vs K.R.Moniamma on 18 December, 2019 Equivalent citations: AIRONLINE 2019

para 94), this Court observed that the modern trend points to judicial restraint in administrative action. The same view has been taken in a large ... operation of law or affects the individual or society. Though judicial restraint, albeit self- http://www.judis

operation of law or affects the individual or society. Though judicial restraint, albeit self-recognised, is the order of the day, yet an administrative decision ... what lies outside the power of judicial review is necessary to preserve the sanctity of judicial power. Judicial power is respected and adhered

Supreme Court observed: (1) The modern trend points to judicial restraint in administrative action. (2) The Court does not sit as a Court of appeal ... certain that he is right. Judicial humility should therefore prevail over judicial activism in this respect. 34. Judicial restraint is consistent with and complementary

Supreme Court observed: (1) The modern trend points to judicial restraint in administrative action. (2) The Court does not sit as a Court of appeal ... certain that he is right. Judicial humility should therefore prevail over judicial activism in this respect. 34. Judicial restraint is consistent with and complementary

operation of law or affects the individual or society. Though judicial restraint, albeit self- recognised, is the order of the day, yet an administrative decision ... There should be judicial restraint while making judicial review in administrative matters. Where irrelevant aspects have been eschewed from consideration and no relevant aspect

operation of law or affects the individual or society. Though judicial restraint, albeit self-recognised, is the order of the day, yet an administrative decision ... what lies outside the power of judicial review is necessary to preserve the sanctity of judicial power. Judicial power is respected and adhered

procedure set for it by rules of public administration." 18. . Judicial restraint in exercise of Judicial review was considered in the State ... that of another person on a particular matter. The need for judicial restraint with regard to recommendations of expert committees, more particularly in matters relating

private law, even though its exercise is to be tempered by judicial restraint to avoid circumvention of private law remedies, where more appropriate

private law, even though its exercise is to be tempered by judicial restraint to avoid circumvention of private law remedies, where more appropriate