executive and legislative branches of the
Government is subject to judicial restraint, the only
check upon our exercise of power is our own sense ... recognition of the limits of judicial review, a respect for
the boundaries of legislative and judicial functions, and the judicial
responsibility to guard the trespass
restraint upon it is the self-imposed
discipline of self-restraint. Independence and adherence to
constitutional accountability and limits while exercising the power of
judicial ... When we speak about judicial review, it is also
necessary to be alive to the concept of judicial
restraint. The duty of judicial review which
para 94), this Court observed that the modern trend points to
judicial restraint in administrative action. The same view has been
taken in a large ... operation of law or
affects the individual or society. Though judicial restraint, albeit self-
http://www.judis
Krishna Mahadevan @ Mahadevan vs K.R.Moniamma on 18 December, 2019
Equivalent citations: AIRONLINE 2019
procedure set for it by rules of public
administration.”
18. Judicial restraint in exercise of Judicial review was
considered in the State ... that of
another person on a particular matter. The need for judicial
restraint with regard to recommendations of expert committees,
more particularly in matters relating
been taken purely on public interest, the
court ordinarily should exercise judicial restraint."
(emphasis supplied)
27.1. In Asia Foundation & Construction Ltd., v Trafalgar ... considered. Supreme Court held,
"7. the modern trend points to judicial restraint in
administrative action. The Court does not sit as a Court
Labex K.K. International vs State Of Gujarat on 9 May, 2019
Author: K.M
Supreme Court considered certain principles,
namely; the modern trend points to judicial restraint on
administrative action; the role of the court is only to review ... power will be struck down.
10. The modern trend points to judicial restraint in
administrative action. The Court does not sit as a court
taken purely on public interest, the
court ordinarily should exercise judicial
restraint."
31. In the case of Manohar Lal Sharma Vs.
Narendra Damodardas Modi ... Tata
Cellular wherein certain principles, namely, the
modern trend pointing to judicial restraint on
administrative action; the role of the court is
only to review
Since the present case pertains to the
crucial doctrine of judicial restraint, we are of the
considered opinion that encroaching into the right ... would have agreed
with Mr. B.B. Singh. The doctrine of judicial
restraint which has been emphasised repeatedly
by this Court e.g. in Aravali
