economic regulation cases, there are good reasons for judicial self-restraint if not judicial deference to legislative judgment. The Legislature after all has the affirmative ... events-self-limitation can be seen to be the path of judicial wisdom and institutional prestige and stability. (See Joseph Tussman and Jacobus ten Breck
economic regulation cases, there
are good reasons for judicial self-restraint if not judicial
difference to legislative judgment. The legislature after
all has the affirmative ... events-self-
limitation can be seen to be the path to judicial wisdom
and institutional prestige and stability.
The court must always remember that
away judicial discretion in matter of appreciation of evidence directing the trial Courts to convict accused in all Corruption cases irrespective of its judicial satisfaction ... fact and real appreciation of evidence is the test of judicial wisdom and sound common sense of the trial Court! This indeed requires basic judicial
Yunusbhai Usmanbhai Shaikh vs State Of Gujarat & on 23 September, 2015
Author: J.B
matter of policy decision and economic tests
the scope of judicial review is very limited. Unless the decision
is shown to be contrary ... more scientific or more logical. Wisdom and advisability of
economic policy are ordinarily not amenable to judicial review.
In matters relating to economic issues
economic regulation cases, there are good reasons for judicial self-restraint if not judicial deference to legislative judgment. The legislature after all has the affirmative ... events self-limitation can be seen to be the path to judicial wisdom and institutional prestige and stability.'
What we said in that case
economic regulation cases, there are good reasons for judicial self-restraint if not judicial deference to legislative judgment. The Legislature after all has the affirmative ... events-self-limitation can be seen 10 be the path to judicial wisdom and institutional prestige and stability." (page 1314)
67. In the case
economic regulation cases, there are good reasons for judicial self-restraint, if not judicial deference to legislative judgment.
The Legislature, after all has the affirmative ... events ---- self-limitation can be seen to be the path of judicial wisdom and institutional prestige and stability (see Joseph Tussman and Jacobusten Brook
repugnant either to any constitutional provision or to any law, judicial wisdom commands non-interference with such policy decisions, however far-reaching the consequences
transfer of a judicial officer exercising its Constitutional powers under Article 235 , be supplanted or implanted by the judicial wisdom, by the High Court ... contention, he has also contended that the administrative wisdom cannot be substituted by the Judicial decision and that too at the interlocutory stage without entering
