Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

Moosa vs Sub Inspector Of Police on 23 December, 2005 Equivalent citations: 2006CRILJ1922, 2006(1

economic regulation cases, there are good reasons for judicial self-restraint if not judicial deference to legislative judgment. The legislature after all has the affirmative ... events -- self- limitation can be seen to be the path and judicial wisdom and institutional prestige and stability. The Court must always remember that

M/S.Fantacy Sales Corporation vs The Sales Tax Inspector on 8 March, 2007 Author

definition will be applied by the very enactment. Sometimes, accumulated judicial wisdom dealing with the term, would be the sole helpful guide. 49. The statutory ... term action has not been defined. 50. When there is a judicial proceeding, where matters have to be proved and issues raised, it could

economic regulation cases, there are good reasons for judicial self-restraint, if not judicial deference to legislative judgment. The Legislature after all has the affirmative ... events self-limitation can be seen to be the path to judicial wisdom and institutional prestige and stability". 37. In G.K. Krishnan

repeatedly stated that Courts while examining constitutional validity should not substitute judicial wisdom in the place of the legislature. So long as there

St.Mary'S Orthodox Church vs Thankamani Rajan on 20 March, 2004 IN THE

economic regulation cases, there are good reasons for judicial self-restraint, if not judicial deference to legislative judgment. The Legislature after all has the affirmative ... events-self-limitation can be seen to be the path to judicial wisdom and institutional prestige and stability". 13(c). In O.K. Krishnan

invoke its jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution. Sagacity and judicial wisdom are required to identify the fit cases in which such jurisdiction

court is counter majoritarian. Its loyalty to legislation--short of judicial review--cannot be "more loyal than the king." Its sympathies ... underdog, and the rule of law becomes his bulwark. The judicial wisdom dictates that the fundamental rights of an individual cannot