economic regulation cases, there
are good reasons for judicial self-restraint if not judicial
deference to legislative judgement. The legislature after all has
the affirmative ... events
self-limitation can be seen to be the path to judicial wisdom
and institutional prestige and stability.
What we said in that case
that in
matters such as these, which
reflect matters of policy, judicial
wisdom is judicial restraint.
Generally matters of policy have
little adjudicative disposition
that in matters such as these,
which reflect matters of policy, judicial wisdom is judicial
restraint. Generally matters of policy have little
adjudicative disposition
J.Alex Ponseelan vs The Director General Of Police on 27 February, 2014
Author: R
economic regulation cases, there
are good reasons for judicial self-restraint if not judicial
deference to legislative judgment. The legislature after all has
the affirmative ... events self-limitation
can be seen to be the path to judicial wisdom and institutional
prestige and stability.'
What we said in that case
that in matters such as these which reflects matter of policy, judicial wisdom is judicial restraint generally matters of policy have little adjudicative disposition
Legislative policy may not be open to judicial review but when
the wisdom takes the concrete form of law, the same must
stand the test
Dipti Dipak Kolapkar vs The Maharashtra Public Service on 7 May, 2009
Author: Swatanter Kumar
economic regulation cases, there are good reasons for judicial self-
restraint if not judicial deference to legislative judgment. The
legislature, after all, has the affirmative ... events -- self-
limitation can be seen to be the path to judicial wisdom and
institutional prestige and stability, so observes Morey
primary goal of any provision for
dependent employment or compassionate appointment. Judicial wisdom
running through binding precedents clearly advise us that the operation of such
