appellant has filed five identical RTI applications dated 16.1.11,
seeking information on Keyman Insurance Policies with various offices of
LIC, which have been registered with ... their submissions on common lines,
as follows:-
a) The information pertaining to Keyman Insurance Policies is held by
the LIC in a fiduciary capacity hence
appellant has filed five identical RTI applications dated 16.1.11,
seeking information on Keyman Insurance Policies with various offices of
LIC, which have been registered with ... their submissions on common lines,
as follows:-
a) The information pertaining to Keyman Insurance Policies is held by
the LIC in a fiduciary capacity hence
appellant has filed five identical RTI applications dated 16.1.11,
seeking information on Keyman Insurance Policies with various offices of
LIC, which have been registered with ... their submissions on common lines,
as follows:-
a) The information pertaining to Keyman Insurance Policies is held by
the LIC in a fiduciary capacity hence
appellant has filed five identical RTI applications dated 16.1.11,
seeking information on Keyman Insurance Policies with various offices of
LIC, which have been registered with ... their submissions on common lines,
as follows:-
a) The information pertaining to Keyman Insurance Policies is held by
the LIC in a fiduciary capacity hence
appellant has filed five identical RTI applications dated 16.1.11,
seeking information on Keyman Insurance Policies with various offices of
LIC, which have been registered with ... their submissions on common lines,
as follows:-
a) The information pertaining to Keyman Insurance Policies is held by
the LIC in a fiduciary capacity hence
perused.
FACTS
Vide RTI dt 30.3.11, appellant had sought information relating to
Keyman Insurance policies.
2. CPIO vide letter dt 28.4.11, rejected the information ... contended that larger public interest is involved
in disclosure of information about keyman insurance policies as
siphoning of funds by key persons is involved
