Sara Services & Engineers Pvt. Ltd., New ... vs Acit, New Delhi on 18 January, 2016
Dcit, New Delhi vs M/S. Sara Services & Enginners Pvt. ... on 18 January, 2016
made
by the AO to the contents of the VCR regarding the Kickbacks paid by
the assessee to Iraq Government. However, it is submitted ... establishing the payments are made for the business purposes
and not as kickbacks to Iraq Government. Further, the Tribunal also
sharp criticism for its functioning, and there were allegations of massive
irregularities, kickbacks and corruption in its functioning. It was in this
backdrop that ... amounts
so collected by these front companies were passed on as kickbacks to
Iraqi regime. This is the area which concerns the issue in this
Kohli, the Ld. Departmental Representative,
submitted that the assessee has paid kickbacks for supplying
material to Iraq under "Food for Oil Programme". According ... assessee is also found to be one of the
companies paid kickbacks to Iraqi Government and its agents. The
Assessing Officer disallowed the claim
Nations (UN) on humanitarian consideration, by
Saddham Hussain regime in Iraq. The kickback policy as per the
report began in mid 1999 when Iraq started ... Iraq had started a broaded policy to
impose generally 10% kickback requirement on all humanitarian
contracts. This was termed as "After Sale Service
sustaining the
addition of Rs. 25,20,000/- on account of kickbacks
paid to Dalmia Cement, in the hands of the assessee
without there being ... assessee.
7.2 Without prejudice to the above, the amount of alleged
kickbacks computed by the Ld. AO and then sustained
Food
Programme by Saddam Hussain Regime in Iraq , the kickback were being
paid to Iraq Govt in the form of inland transportation fees ... allowable under
section 37(1) of the Act being the kickbacks. The assessee did not prefer
any appeal before any higher forum against the above
This fact is sufficient
to discount the theory of kickback.
Page | 17
ITA No.3850/Del/2023 & Others
(b) The consortium bank ... encashed the bank guarantee.
(g) There is no document suggesting payment of kickbacks by
LANCO to the assessee. The entire case of the Assessing
Officer
payee
cheque issued in the name of Ashoka Buildcon Ltd. is a kickback given by the
appellant sub-contractor to Ashoka Buildcon Ltd;
(vii) that ... appears that M/s. Ashoka Buildcon
Ltd. received this amount as kickback from M/s. Rushabh Construction who is a
sub-contractor