2012 Page 6 of 8
behind the said kidnapping. In Malleshi‟s case (supra), it was observed as
under:-
"In the instant case ... case Section 34 has been rightly
invoked. The act of kidnapping in the present case was not possible by one
person. It was a joint
that it was a case of fake
kidnapping.
21. A-1's conduct throughout is unnatural and unreasonable.
Nothing has been explained ... separate sentence under that head is called for. It being a case
of kidnapping for ransom, sentence under Section 394 IPC too is
uncalled
microslides having faint smear described as
„Vaginal secretion‟ kept in a plastic case).
9. The prosecutrix is stated to be aged around 14 years.
However ... often used to run from the house and even a kidnapping
case had been registered and she could not be found on one occasion
Section
359 defines Kidnapping. It envisions two types of kidnapping i.e. (1)
kidnapping from India; and (2) kidnapping from lawful guardianship.
Abduction (defined ... important ingredient of Section 364A is the abduction or
kidnapping, as the case may be. Thereafter, a threat to the
Crl.A. Nos.1315, 1383
Section
359 defines Kidnapping. It envisions two types of kidnapping i.e. (1)
kidnapping from India; and (2) kidnapping from lawful guardianship.
Abduction (defined ... important ingredient of Section 364A is the abduction or
kidnapping, as the case may be. Thereafter, a threat to the
Crl.A. Nos.1315, 1383
Section
359 defines Kidnapping. It envisions two types of kidnapping i.e. (1)
kidnapping from India; and (2) kidnapping from lawful guardianship.
Abduction (defined ... important ingredient of Section 364A is the abduction or
kidnapping, as the case may be. Thereafter, a threat to the
Crl.A. Nos.1315, 1383
Section
359 defines Kidnapping. It envisions two types of kidnapping i.e. (1)
kidnapping from India; and (2) kidnapping from lawful guardianship.
Abduction (defined ... important ingredient of Section 364A is the abduction or
kidnapping, as the case may be. Thereafter, a threat to the
Crl.A. Nos.1315, 1383
informed by the police that these persons
were involved in a case of kidnapping. He came to know that a
boy was kidnapped. However ... villagers that
police had arrested the accused persons in case a of
kidnapping. However, he had not seen the kidnapped person.
He did not even
core facts about the kidnapping and the
role attributed to the accused remained identical. In the case of A.Shankar
v. State of Karnataka ... root of the case are not fatal
to the prosecution case. Non-recovery of the brick with which the child
was injured is inconsequential. There
local police of Shikohabad recovered the
kidnapped child from the accused Vijay @ Vijender and Jagbir Singh.
Separate cases bearing ... prosecution to prove that accused kidnapped the child and kept him under
detention after such kidnapping and that the kidnapping was for ransom.
Furthermore
