Sessions Trial No.2 of 2009/ 19 of 2009.
2. The case of the Informant according to P.W.5
Rajendra is that ... been kidnapped and they were pressurizing him to withdraw an earlier
case of kidnapping and it is for this reason that the child had been
Sessions Trial No.2 of 2009/ 19 of 2009.
2. The case of the Informant according to P.W.5
Rajendra is that ... been kidnapped and they were pressurizing him to withdraw an earlier
case of kidnapping and it is for this reason that the child had been
Sessions Trial No.2 of 2009/ 19 of 2009.
2. The case of the Informant according to P.W.5
Rajendra is that ... been kidnapped and they were pressurizing him to withdraw an earlier
case of kidnapping and it is for this reason that the child had been
Sessions Trial No.2 of 2009/ 19 of 2009.
2. The case of the Informant according to P.W.5
Rajendra is that ... been kidnapped and they were pressurizing him to withdraw an earlier
case of kidnapping and it is for this reason that the child had been
PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.19689 of 2016
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -293 Year- 2015 Thana -PHULWARI District- PATNA
======================================================
Hridya Narayan Pandey @ Hridya Nand ... Pandey, maternal
uncle of the victim, lodged this case against Rajesh Kumar
Pandey regarding the kidnapping of his niece. In course of
investigation, the victim
against the accused-
petitioners on perusal of the materials available in the case diary.
3. The facts leading to this application are that the opposite
Patna ... circumstances of the case and
also considering the fact that the victim/opposite party no.3, who is said to
be kidnapped by the petitioners
said to have
kidnapped the minor daughter of the informant, has falsely been
implicated in this case. In her statement recorded under Section ... Sunita Devi having her hand in her kidnapping.
Having considered the facts and the circumstances of
the case, let the petitioner no.2, namely, Sunita
detailed in paragraph 15 of the case diary, the daughter of the
informant has denied about her kidnapping or enticing away at
the hands ... Code, as detailed in paragraph 15 of the case diary,
stated that she was not kidnapped by the petitioner.
Having regard to the facts
case diary and her age
has been assessed between 16 to 17 years, as detailed in para 75 of the
case diary ... detailed in para 82 of
the case diary regarding her kidnapping by this petitioner and
one Vijay. Further submission is that petitioners have no
criminal
Case No.109 of 2016 registered under Sections 363 and
366 / 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
The accusation is of kidnapping of the wife ... appear from the F.I.R. and the case diary that
the occurrence is of kidnapping the wife of the informant is in the
Patna
