appellants,
submits that in the case, there is no ocular evidence to
support the prosecution case nor there is any other plausible
evidence, which ... with one Santosh Kumar Singh, who was made
accused in a case of kidnapping of daughter (deceased) of
appellants. Thereafter, the daughter of the appellants
shawl.
3. The prosecution case, in nut shell, is that in the
intervening night of 14.04.2017 and 15.04.2017, the
accused kidnapped the deceased ... merciless manner in which the deceased was
kidnapped, raped and thereafter done to death found
the case to be in the category of "rarest
introduced by Ramdas at the place of Kadam
Singh. He was kidnapping persons for ransom. There were 11
persons in his gang and since ... understanding the consequences of his acts.
27. In the case of Narain Singh Vs. State of Punjab as
reported
matrimonial home and the
appellant had not set up a case that the offence was
committed by somebody else or that there was a
possibility ... Evidence Act in the following words:
( Mir Mohammad Omar case (2000) 8 SCC p 393 para 35)
"35. During arguments we put a question
matrimonial home and the appellant had not set
up a case that the offence was committed by
somebody else or that there was a possibility ... Section 106 of the Evidence Act inthe following
words: ( Mir Mohammad Omar case (2000) 8 SCC p
393 para 35)
"35. During arguments
matrimonial home and the appellant had not set
up a case that the offence was committed by
somebody else or that there was a possibility ... Section 106 of the Evidence Act inthe following
words: ( Mir Mohammad Omar case (2000) 8 SCC p
393 para 35)
"35. During arguments
matrimonial home and the appellant had not set
up a case that the offence was committed by
somebody else or that there was a possibility ... Evidence Act in the following
words: ( Mir Mohammad Omar case (2000) 8 SCC p
393 para 35)
"35. During arguments we put a question
matrimonial home and the appellant had not set
up a case that the offence was committed by
somebody else or that there was a possibility ... Section 106 of the Evidence Act inthe following
words: ( Mir Mohammad Omar case (2000) 8 SCC p
393 para 35)
"35. During arguments
night, two unknown persons have
entered into his house who intended to kidnap
Panchasheelabai, and in the scuffle deceased and P.W.-
1 Panchasheelabai ... Dayaram. In view of these facts,
the story of intended kidnapping put up by the defence
does not inspire confidence.
11. From the aforesaid scrutiny
Dherender was also involved in 2-3 other murder cases as
informed to him by Sanjay brother of Dherender. Dherender
had also murdered the daughter ... sister of
Dherender later on met them and informed that Dherender
had kidnapped her son and demanded ransom for the
release
