view that mere insignificant, contradictions and inconsistencies
will not affect the prosecution case.
17. We have also perused the statement given by the witnesses
under ... Therefore, kidnapping or abduction will not be
attracted in this case so as to bring the act of the accused under Section
consensual relationship and
therefore, the theory of kidnapping cannot be countenanced.
7. Arguing further, the learned counsel would submit that
while the accident register records ... medical evidence would have a
bearing on the credibility of the case of the prosecution. The learned
counsel would also plead that the quantum
consensual relationship and
therefore, the theory of kidnapping cannot be countenanced.
7. Arguing further, the learned counsel would submit that
while the accident register records ... medical evidence would have a
bearing on the credibility of the case of the prosecution. The learned
counsel would also plead that the quantum
consensual relationship and
therefore, the theory of kidnapping cannot be countenanced.
7. Arguing further, the learned counsel would submit that
while the accident register records ... medical evidence would have a
bearing on the credibility of the case of the prosecution. The learned
counsel would also plead that the quantum
aged about 17 years. The petitioner suspects the 3rd
respondent of having kidnapped the minor girl. A girl missing complaint in
Crime No.88/2022 ... learned Additional Public Prosecutor, upon
instructions, would submit that it is a case of elopement and there is a love
affair between the 3rd respondent
about 16 years.
2. According to the petitioner, his minor daughter was kidnapped by
the third respondent, who is none other than the husband ... search to trace the detenue and the third
respondent. Already a case was registered under 'girl missing' and once the
detenue
Revathi.
Suspecting that the third respondent who is the lender would have
kidnapped his wife, the petitioner had launched this proceedings.
3. Mr.A.Thiruvadi ... appearing for the State, upon instructions, would submit that it is a case
of elopement. The third respondent has nothing to do with the cause
eight (8) months. It is alleged that the
minor child has been kidnapped by the respondents 3 to 5. The third
respondent is the mother ... illegal detention as
alleged by the petitioner. It is not a case for exercising jurisdiction under
Article 226 of Constitution of India, when
