defence.
19. As noticed earlier, in this case there is no direct eye witness regarding kidnapping and murder of the deceased boy. But as would ... have doubts in respect of the accused persons but in a case of kidnapping the close relations avoid causing risk to the life
body was identified with the help of photograph and that a case for
kidnapping of the dead boy had been lodged by father ... informant of Kudhni P.S.Case No.128 of 2006. She did not mention the fact
in the case diary that she had received photographs
body was identified with the help of photograph and that a case for
kidnapping of the dead boy had been lodged by father ... informant of Kudhni P.S.Case No.128 of 2006. She did not mention the fact
in the case diary that she had received photographs
body was identified with the help of photograph and that a case for
kidnapping of the dead boy had been lodged by father ... informant of Kudhni P.S.Case No.128 of 2006. She did not mention the fact
in the case diary that she had received photographs
body was identified with the help of photograph and that a case for
kidnapping of the dead boy had been lodged by father ... informant of Kudhni P.S.Case No.128 of 2006. She did not mention the fact
in the case diary that she had received photographs
body was identified with the help of photograph and that a case for
kidnapping of the dead boy had been lodged by father ... informant of Kudhni P.S.Case No.128 of 2006. She did not mention the fact
in the case diary that she had received photographs
body was identified with the help of photograph and that a case for
kidnapping of the dead boy had been lodged by father ... informant of Kudhni P.S.Case No.128 of 2006. She did not mention the fact
in the case diary that she had received photographs
deposing that his brother Nawal Yadav was subjected to kidnapping and in connection with that case the appellant had gone to jail and came ... been made that she has stated in court that the case of kidnapping of her son had occurred eight years earlier whereas in the fardbayan
been kidnapped. From the evidence of these two witnesses it appears that they were not at all involved with the investigation of the case ... evidence in this case because none has come forward to depose in Court of having seen any of the appellants kidnapping or abducting the victim
being disposed of by this common judgment.
2. The prosecution case, as disclosed
in the written report (Ext-1) of Sudhir Kumar
Sinha ... admittedly a case where
there is no eyewitness and therefore no direct
21
evidence either in respect of kidnapping of
Sumit Kumar or his killing
