appellants guilty of kidnapping, the High Court found
that the case of kidnapping of a child was wrongly entered
against the appellants.
In the chain ... earliest cases of kidnapping and murder
committed by these appellants relates to the incident of
kidnapping of one Santosh. The prosecution case is that
names RL Yurhor, Ashang and
Jonney as named as accused in the case.
(xiii) Conduct of the abductors do not show that it was abduction ... case of the prosecution that despite ceasefire agreement of
1997, the NSCN(IM) people are kidnapping, abducting and
killing persons holding high positions in civil
commission of murder of Amjad.
BRIEF FACTS/ CASE OF THE PROSECUTION:
(2) The case of the prosecution is that on 25.3.2009 at about ... case namely Sanjeev @ Baba,
Vishal @ Monu and Vijay @ Munna were arrested. Thereafter, the
above three accused persons were formally arrested in the present case
case was registered against
accused Sheeshpal and investigation of the case was taken over by SI
Parsuram. During the investigation of the case, SI Parshuram ... wherein he
denied the case of prosecution and stated that he has been falsely implicated
in this case. He never kidnapped and killed Laxmi
believed that
Abhay Singh and Vijay Singh were behind the anti corruption case of CBI
against him and he believed that he had lost ... also annoyed with Abhay Singh and Vijay Singh for lodging a kidnapping
case against the cousin brother of Rishipal. On the day of incident, Abhay
crime
6
justifies awarding of death sentence in the present case, where the
appellant kidnapped a minor girl who was not of sound physical ... been the case of prosecution that on being questioned, the
appellant stated that he had killed the girl whom he kidnapped near R. K.
Hospital
remissions,
before consideration of his case for premature
release.”
In the case of Selvam v. State4 which is a case involving
murder and rape ... jail
without remission. In the case of Tattu Lodhi v. State of
Madhya Pradesh5 in a case involving kidnapping of minor girl
aged about
given in this case which clearly mentioned that it was for the purpose of extracting ransom that the child was kidnapped. Also specific questions ... barren letter demanding ransom had been put for proving the case that the kidnapping had been effected for the purpose of extracting ransom from
readwith Section 34 IPC, charge of
kidnapping, concealment/abduction of a kidnapped person under Sections
363 and 368 and charge under section 506 Part ... findings in the impugned judgment
wherein it is recorded that no case of kidnapping etc. under Section
366 / 368 IPC is made out. Learned counsel
There is no material evidence or eyewitness in
the instant case and the entire case rests on circumstantial
evidence. The prosecution is relying ... case of A.N. Venkatesh &
another vs. State of Karnataka reported in 2005 (7)
SCC 714. It was a case for kidnapping for ransom
