Railway
Station, Guntakal, in the auto of PW5, where he started
kissing her. This act of Accused was noticed by PW2 and
others and questioned ... forcibly
kissing PW1. When PW1 was questioned as to why she
is with Accused, PW1 is said to have explained the facts
to them
conflict with the law)
unlawfully entered her house, held her, and kissed her. Frightened, she raised
an alarm. P.W.4, Darisi Rajamma, a neighbour ... allegedly caught her hands from behind, waking her, while Accused No. 1
kissed her on the cheeks. When she cried out, they allegedly covered
attend the agricultural works. Then the
accused reached close to her, kissed on her cheek and lips. The
girl did not like it and immediately ... complaint the
victim girl omitted to mention about kiss on her lips and cheek
and she brought those statements only in her sworn evidence
sleep on the bed naked, touched her private
parts and later, kissed them. Again, on 12.4.2005 evening, A-1
took P.W.2 inside ... noticed P.W.2 lying
naked on the cot and A-1 kissing on her private parts. On seeing
daughter
Dhanusree, while she was at her residence, tO his house and kissed her and
also touched her body and behaved in indecent manner ... when the complainant
opened the mobile, he noticed the accused was kissing his daughter and his
daughter was kissing the accused. Immediately the accused deleted
@ vs T on 29 July, 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
@ vs T on 29 July, 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
@ vs T on 29 July, 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
@ vs T on 29 July, 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
@ vs T on 29 July, 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
