basis of forged documents executed between the individuals and forged kist receipts enclosed as plaint document Nos. 19 to 21. The IAs were after ... sale consideration. The enquiry in the Tahsildar office reveals that kist receipts in C77 series for the faslis 1405, 1406 and 1407, which were filed
account not only the documents
filed by the plaintiff such as kist receipts, patta and adangal, but also how
the possession by the plaintiff continued ... mere basis of the finding that the defendant had
also filed kist receipts, the appellate Court had come to an erroneous
conclusion that the plaintiff
been filed to receive the Kist Receipts as additional documents.
Contending that the Kist Receipts were not traceable during the Trial, learned
counsel ... Appellants submitted that the Kist Receipts are public
documents and are necessarily to be admitted. It is further submitted that if
the additional documents produced
suit property and that he was paying kist for the suit properties; that the
kist receipts, chitta and adangal extract are fabricated documents and they ... could pay the kist as it has occurred in the instant case that
the authorities concerned have issued the kist receipts both in favour
name and Exs.A.4 to A.11 are the kists receipts paid by him in respect of the suit property and he has issued ... know to which properties Exs.A.4 to A.11-Kists Receipts were related and that he does not know about the passing
paying Kists for Patta No.90 for Faslis 1389 to 1393 as evidenced from Exs.A-5 and A-6-Kist Receipts for Fasli ... mentioned that the Kist has been paid on behalf of the Kandasamy (plaintiff) by Kalia perumal.
19. The aforesaid kist receipts reveal that no patta
suit property, instead plaintiffs filed only patta, adangal and kist receipts
to prove that the suit properties were assigned to their predecessor-in-
interest ... learned counsel further submitted that mere filing of patta,
adangal and kist receipts are not sufficient to establish the
respondents/plaintiffs right over the suit
defendants in Ex.B.20
which are all the kist receipts and adangal extracts, which were in the
names of the plaintiffs. The trial court ... counsel contended that the documents marked by the appellants
are only kist receipts and 'A' register extracts which are not title
documents
cannot be accepted. In this connection, it is found that some kist receipts has come to be marked on the side of the plaintiff ... seen from the documents placed by the plaintiff, the kist receipts marked by the plaintiff
show payment of kist in the name
of Mohamed Fathumal. All the said kist receipts were issued after the death of
Mohamed Fathumal. Eventhough Mohammed ... person who remitted the kist. Therefore
no importance can be attached to the said kist receipts. Ex.A3 is the kist
receipt for five
