found that the
defendant / appellant has not proved his case. The kist receipts were found
to be in different names and many of the documents ... lower appellate Court is
right in coming to the conclusion that the kist receipts are not pertaining
to the suit property so as to substantiate
cross examination that Angammal was paying kist in her name and in the name of her husband for patta No.221.
22. I have carefully ... which is termed as a holding register does not have any statutory value inasmuch as it is not a register which is to be maintained
found that the
defendant / appellant has not proved his case. The kist receipts were found
to be in different names and many of the documents ... lower appellate Court is
right in coming to the conclusion that the kist receipts are not pertaining
to the suit property so as to substantiate
from 1965 to 1986 on the side of the Appellant/Plaintiff. The kist receipts Ex.A.2 to Ex.A.11 are of little ... factum of possession and enjoyment. Ex.A.12 to Ex.A.20 Kist Receipts are all after filing of the suit and hence, there
original unregistered sale deed could not be
traced out and other three Kist receipts obtained only after the suit was
filed.
6.The Revision Petitioner ... valid under Law and the same is not having evidentiary value. Further, the
unregistered sale deed cannot be looked into even for collateral purpose
Bejoy Gopal Mukherji vs Pratul Chandra Ghose on 28 January, 1953
Equivalent citations: 1953 AIR
K.Arumuga Velaiah vs Pr.Ramasamy And Another on 27 January, 2022
Author: B.V
C.S. Kumaraswami Gounder vs Aravagiri Gounder And Anr. on 10 April, 1973
Equivalent citations
Venkatasubramaniya Chettiar (Died) vs Perumal Chettiar on 9 March, 2012
Author: R.Banumathi
Bench: R
Raja Keesara Venkatappayya Alias ... vs Raja Nayani Venkataranga Rao And Ors. on 1 May, 1919
