notice was sent to the
counsel seeking the return of partition koor chit dated 29.07.1992 and
the sale deed. Counsel replied on 18.05.2013 stating that ... submission of learned counsel for appellants that they handed over koor
chit dated 29.07.1992 and sale deed dated 19.06.1979 to the counsel
engaged by them
time of filing suit, the plaintiff has marked the Koor Chit dated 11.02.2000. At the time of trial, the revision petitioner/first defendant has come ... application in I.A.No.548 of 2011 stating that the Koor Chit is not an admissible evidence and it cannot be marked
said
property by metes and bounds by virtue of a Koor-chit dated 10.07.1996 and
the said instrument is binding on the parties. The suit ... extracting the 1st Defendant’s hard earned labor exhibited in the Koor-
chit dated 10.7.1996 to claim exclusive possession over the property which
partition has been reduced into writing,
by way of koor chit dated 31.08.1963 (Ex.A9) whereby, the
northern portion was allotted to the Natesa ... Naicker and on his death, Alamelu Ammal has released the koor chit
under Ex.A11 in her favour and the said Alamelu Ammal
said Ramalingam and the defendants have executed a Koor chit again divided such properties among themselves. The execution of koor chit ... partial partition. They have not included the plaintiffs in the koor chit nor given any property in the same. When once the plaintiffs have been
declaration. In the said suit, the petitioner has marked the
Koor Chit, dated 11.02.2000, as an exhibit. Hence, the first respondent
herein/first defendant ... application in I.A.No.548 of 2011 to
reject the Koor Chit stating that Koor Chit is not an admissible evidence
and the same
ratio of family debts.
2.4. The plaintiff would contend that the koor chit was
executed on 05.08.1971 which was signed by all the parties ... judis
S.A.No.164 of 2024
koor chit is with the first defendant. Contrary to the partition that
had been effected under the koor
effected earlier under two Memoranda of Oral Partition termed as koor
chits dated 03.02.1973 and on 10.02.1973. The manner in which the
properties were partitioned ... under koor chit dated 03.02.1973 is set out at
paragraph-4 (iii) of the counter affidavit. Similarly, the manner in which the
properties were partitioned
notice was sent to the
counsel seeking the return of partition koor chit dated 29.07.1992 and
the sale deed. Counsel replied on 18.05.2013 stating that ... submission of learned counsel for appellants that they handed over koor
chit dated 29.07.1992 and sale deed dated 19.06.1979 to the counsel
engaged by them
notice was sent to the
counsel seeking the return of partition koor chit dated 29.07.1992 and
the sale deed. Counsel replied on 18.05.2013 stating that ... submission
of learned counsel for appellants that they handed over koor chit dated
29.07.1992 and sale deed dated 19.06.1979 to the counsel engaged by
them
