laid down that 13 to be the proper multiplier.
(iii) In Koyappathodi M. Ayisha Umma v State of Kerala , their Lordships, in this case, have
admit the evidence which is now sought to be produced (Vide: KOYAPPATHODI M.AIYSHA UMMA v. STATE OF KERALA . The appellant submits that, this evidence ... acquired. This will come to Rs. 1,400/- per gunta.
35.1. In Koyappathodi M. Ayisha Umma v. State Of Kerala , evidence of transactions in respect
Consequently we reject I.A.II.
17.8. In a recent Decision, in KOYAPPATHODI M.A.EYSHA UMMA v. STATE OF KERALA , Supreme Court upheld
Judgment of
the Apex Court rendered in the case of Koyappathodi M.
Ayisha Umma vs State Of Kerala reported in AIR 1991
Supreme Court
cutting and removing. This principle is reiterated by the Supreme Court is KOYAPPATHODI M. AYISHA UMMA v. STATE OF KERALA , , in which the Court
