dispute that the subject land was a kumki land and that kumki right thereon had to go with the main land that was originally owned ... that the kumki right in the subject land had to go along with the rights in the warg land and that right admittedly
land in R.S.170/1b of Kasaragode village, claiming Kumki
right over the same. The District Collector and the
Commissioner of Land Revenue rejected ... kumki land, and
to assign the said land to others. At this stage he filed
O.P.2509/64 before this Court, claiming kumki right
Government or on the Deputy Commissioner extinguishing the kumki rights. The right to regulate the kumki rights, in my view, has to be understood ... Government lands and the petitioners were only enjoying kumki privileges. The kumki privileges relate only the right to remove the green leaves required for procuring
said properties, the property over
which the petitioners have kumki right is situate. At an
earlier instance, when the Deputy Commissioner by the
order dated ... said
land is already held to be kumki land and the procedure
stated for extinguishing such kumki rights has already
attained finality
right to regulate the
kumki rights has to be understood as the right to extinguish
the kumki rights, depending upon the facts and circumstances ... view that even if kumki
rights are recognized as property rights, however, such rights
are subject to statutory rules and they are exercised subject
together had
Kumki rights over 04 acres 50 cents of land in survey
No. 156/1A and also 04 acres 78 cents in survey ... which the petitioner has kumki
rights and the right of the petitioner with reference to
the kumki rights is discussed at length and thereafter
having
Kakkunji village under Kadim Kumki Right. Subsequently, land in Survey No. 91/9 along with its appurtenant kumki rights, was purchased by him from ... Warg Lands of Respondent 1, and the latter had kumki rights in these plots.
4. On August 2, 1961, Respondent 1 made an application
Deputy Commissioner, Dakshina Kannada, Mangalore, by his order dated 18.3.1996 withdrew Kumki right to the extent of 60 Cents as the same was ordered ... respect of 'Kumki' lands in South Kanara in KC Adigas case held "that 'Kumki' rights could be curtailed, abridged
above referred judgment it has been held that although the said Kumki rights has been styled as privileges in the statutory rules and standing orders ... produce any statutory provision or rules pursuant to which the Kumki rights would have been curtailed, abridged or
taken away and therefore it was held
cultivation of the kumki land and since the wargadar can make use of the kumki land, such use of the kumki land can be punished ... cultivates land within kumki limits, he is not liable to pay any hakkal.
23. Although styled as 'privileges', kumki rights are recognized
